CLOSET MUSLIM, SERVANT TO MUSLIM DICTATORS Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s back door, however, was unique to him. Before prosecutors send some of the dimmer Hollywood stars to the slammer for their dimness, they might want to ask just how much influence a Saudi billionaire peddled to get Obama into Harvard. JACK CASHILL
Thursday, December 13, 2018
KENNETH R. TIMMERMAN - OBAMA'S WAR IS UPON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE - IS HE WORKING ON A MUSLIM-STYLE THIRD TERM FOR LIFE?
BARACK Hussein OBAMA: THE CLOSET MUSLIM
PSYCHOPATH WHO HATED AMERICA!
"But the Obamas are the center of the most delusional cult of
personality that the media has yet spawned. And so we get bizarre
pieces like these."
The mullahs rolled in cash as a result of rolling
Obama and his gullible team over the deal, knowing that Obama was desperate for
some sort of legacy. MONICA SHOWALTER
MUSLIM DICTATORS, INCLUDING THE 9-11 INVADING SAUDIS,
FUNDED THE PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES OF BUSH, CLINTON and OBAMA!
OBAMA’S WAR IS UPON US
How the ex-Radical-in-Chief created a security vacuum that Iran rushed to fill.
Donald Trump has a name for everything and everyone, from Crooked Hillary to Little Rocket Man, who for a time became his best friend. Will he call the next region-wide conflagration in the Middle East, when it breaks out, Obama’s War?
If he hasn’t thought of that already, he should start considering it now. Because the catastrophic policies of our former president have emboldened the Islamic state of Iran and enabled it to threaten the United States and our allies militarily in ways never before possible.
When Obama took office in January 2009, he inherited a strong U.S. military and diplomatic posture across the Middle East.
The U.S.-Israel strategic relationship was at its peak, with the Bush White House openly supporting Operation Cast Lead, Israel’s latest attempt to stop Hamas terror in Gaza.
The U.S. enjoyed a close relationship with a secular Turkey, that itself had strong ties to Israel.
Egypt was at peace, Qaddafi had come into the Western camp and abandoned terrorism and its nuclear weapons program, and the insurgency in Iraq had been crushed.
Al Qaeda truly was “on the run,” while Iran was beginning to feel the crunch of international sanctions over its previously covert nuclear weapons program.
Obama succeeded in reversing every one of these strong U.S. positions, treating Islamic Iran as a friend and Israel as an enemy while promoting the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and its terrorist spawn.
And while President Trump has taken great strides to reverse the enormous damage to our strategic posture Obama caused, fighting his way out of the spider’s web of Iran deal restrictions Obama enacted against the United States has taken nearly two years, time the Iranian regime has put to good use.
Iran today can bracket Israel with more than 150,000 rockets and guided missiles from the North and the South. That’s more than twenty times what it had available during the 2006 war. In addition to its proxies - Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the recently formed Golan Liberation Brigade in Syria – Iran now enjoys a “land bridge” directly linking it through Iraq and Syria to Israel’s northern border.
Terror chief Qais al Khazali, known for his attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq, officially opened the land bridge by leading a military convoy from Iraq into Southern Lebanon in December 2017, where he did a stand-up for an Iranian-backed television network while surveying Israel from the Lebanese side of the border.
Khazali was acting on orders from Quds Force terror-meister, Qassem Suleymani, and met up in Beirut with Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah before heading to the South.
At the same time, the Iranians and their local minions have been burrowing tunnels into Israel from Lebanon that the IDF began targeting last week.
From its bases in Yemen, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps has lobbed missiles at the Saudi capitol, Riyadh, and at oil facilities in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Outgoing U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley forced the media to acknowledge these aggressive Iranian actions by unveiling Iranian missile fragments at a press conference at Andrews Air Force base exactly one year ago.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has now revealed that the ballistic missile Iran test-fired last week was capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads to targets as far away as Europe. Even the Europeans finally realize that the Iran deal did nothing to restrain Iran’s nuclear weapons development or tame its aggressive behavior. It was not the U.S. but France that convened the UN Security Council to condemn the Iranian test.
In a nutshell, Iran today is poised to wreak havoc across the Middle East and beyond with military and strategic capabilities it did not possess a decade ago, including the ability to target U.S. aircraft carriers with ground-based missiles.
Short of U.S. military force, the sole limiting factor on Iran’s actions will be the position of Russian President Vladmir Putin. Will Putin seek to restrain Iran? Or give the Iranian regime free reign?
This is one reason why it is so important for the U.S. President to maintain an open channel of communications to the Kremlin, meeting with Putin, say, at G-20 summit meetings and one-on-one.
Why do you think the anti-Israel Left is so eager to hog-tie President Trump in Russia witch hunt investigations, forcing him to downscale relations with the Russians to the point that the two leaders no longer talk, at least not in public? Because they actually favor a strong Iran and see it and Russia as constraints on the evil United States. As Obama put it in his address to the UN General Assembly in September 2016, “We’ve bound our power to international laws and institutions.”
Russia signaled a strategic shift in its position toward a potential Iranian-led regional war on September 17, when a Syrian air defense crew downed a Russian Ilyushin-20 spy plane over Syrian air space, killing all fourteen Russian crewmen on board.
Putin could have called it a “tragic accident,” which indeed it was. Instead, he blamed Israel for the attack.
Until then, Israel enjoyed a special relationship with Russia when it came to Syria. The IDF had a hot line to the Russian defense ministry, which it used to give a heads up before Israeli air strikes against Iranian positions inside Syria. The result: not a single Russia missile was ever fired at an IDF fighter jet.
When a particularly large strike was in the offing, Prime Minister Netanyahu would fly to Moscow to brief Putin ahead of time. With Putin’s green light, Israel then decimated IRGC and Hezbollah positions.
All of that changed after September 17.
Today, Putin refuses to meet with Netanyahu and the Russian military has rejected Israeli efforts to deconflict its operations in Syria with the Russians.
Last month, Russia turned over operational control of its sophisticated S-300/400 air defense batteries in Syria to the Syrian military, a clear sign that restraint toward IDF fighter jets was over.
On November 29, Israeli showed that it takes these moves seriously, launching its first-ever major strike on Iranian Quds Force position inside Syria using surface-to-surface missiles and long-range artillery. By using unmanned weapons, Israel avoided the possibility that Syrian air defense batteries could shoot down an IDF jet or that Israel might inadvertently kill a Russian military advisor.
After that attack, Netanyahu met in Brussels with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, where the two pledged to work in tandem to contain Iranian “aggression.”
“As we have been warning for some time, Iran’s missile testing and missile proliferation is growing. We are accumulating risk of escalation in the region if we fail to restore deterrence,” Pompeo said.
Taken as a whole, I believe Iran actually welcomes U.S. and Israeli military action, now that Russia has made clear it will no longer restrain Iran. Seen from Tehran, they have many cards to play, including the activation of Iran’s vast underground terror networks in North America and Europe and an ability to target U.S. military bases in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the region.
Successive U.S. administrations have a bad track record of holding the Islamic state of Iran accountable for its aggression. We never responded to the 1983 attack that killed 241 U.S. Marines in Lebanon, nor did we hit Iran for its direct material involvement in the September 11, 2001 attacks on America.
While Team Trump has reimposed sanctions and escalated the rhetoric, it has yet to take military action against Iran’s Islamic regime. But when that happens, make no mistake: the United States will be fighting Obama’s war.
Donald Trump: Barack Obama Gave Iran $150 Billion; Why Not $5 Billion for Wall?
President Donald Trump continued advocating Wednesday for significant funding for his promised wall on the southern border.
“The Democrats and President Obama gave Iran 150 Billion Dollars and got nothing, but they can’t give 5 Billion Dollars for National Security and a Wall?” Trump asked on Twitter.
The president was referring to former President Barack Obama’s controversial $1.7 billion settlement with Iran including a special delivery of $400 million in pallets of cash to the country on the same day that Iran released American prisoners.
Trump demanded Tuesday that Democrats support a deal that includes additional border security funds in a meeting with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
The president also pointed to the recent terrorist attack in France as proof that the United States needed a secure wall on the border.
“We are going to strengthen our borders even more,” he wrote. “Chuck and Nancy must give us the votes to get additional Border Security!”
Obamanomics: How Barack
Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate
Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews: Obama
Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer,
the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed
to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government
policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics,
investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media
ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and
Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming
he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory
robbery—it’s Obamanomics.
President
Barack Obama: During
his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and
transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President
has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political
corruption to the White House. JUDICIAL WATCH
“They knew Obama
was an unqualified crook; yet they promoted him. They knew Obama was a train
wreck waiting to happen; yet they made him president, to the great injury of
America and the world. They understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac,
and a liar; yet they made him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps
irreparable.)”
ALLAN ERICKSON
"We know that
Obama and his inner circle have set up a war room in his D.C. home to plan
and execute resistance to the Trump administration and
his legislative agenda. None of these people care about the
American people, or the fact thatTrump won the election because
millions of people voted for him." Patricia McCarthy / AMERICAN THINKER.com
Obamanomics: How Barack
Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate
Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You
Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same
“special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are
profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers,
small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative
reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and
the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is
delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling
corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s
Obamanomics.
DREAMS FROM HIS WIFE
Michelle Obama's "Becoming" explains it all for you.
The United States is
smothered in a “veil of
impossibility,” and “only one person
will snatch that veil of impossibility off their heads.” That was a fired-up
Michelle Obama back in 2008, but in her new book Becoming,
the former First Lady shows it was possible to advance long before her husband
came on the scene.
Her father Fraser Robinson
worked for the city of Chicago in a water filtration plant. He provided the
family with a middle-class lifestyle and drove a Buick Electra 225, a luxury
car known as a “deuce and a quarter.” Michelle attended Whitney Young high
school where “it was safe to be smart,” and “you never hid your intelligence
for fear of someone saying you talked like a white girl.” Indeed, the author’s
racial consciousness is on full display here.
Families moved to the
suburbs in search of “whiteness.” Washington was “just a faraway city filled
with a lot of white buildings and white men.” The capitol “confused me with its
decorous traditions and sober self-regard, its whiteness and maleness.” And
“people of color” jostle on every hand.
Becoming will
be of interest to the “presidential historians” who hold forth on PBS. General
readers get a sense of the First Family and their experience with in vitro
fertilization. The photo section features one picture of Michelle in a swimsuit
and her book is like a bikini. What it reveals is interesting but what it
conceals is crucial.
In 2008, Michelle
recalls, Christopher Hitchens said of her senior college thesis,
that “to describe it as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be
‘read’ at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This is because it wasn’t
written in any known language.” Michelle was fond of black radicals like
Stokely Carmichael but she wasn’t much of a writer.
On page 224 of Becoming readers
meet David Axelrod, who would “lead the messaging and media for Barack.”
Michelle fails to recall that the New
York Timesdubbed Axelrod “Obama’s narrator” and
his fingerprints are all over this account. Axelrod’s 2015 Believer betrays
the same elephantine style, and a lot more.
Axelrod left journalism
because he liked to tell stories and he describes Obama, who had no record of
publication, as a fantastic writer with the skill of an historical novelist.
As Becoming explains,
the future president “sold his idea for a nonfiction book about race and
identity.” No word that in the 2017 Rising
Star: The Making of Barack Obama, official biographer David Garrow
proclaimed Dreams
from My Father to be “historical fiction”and
the author a “composite character.”
Michelle writes that “he’d
spent the first 20 years of his life going by the nickname Barry,” but
“somewhere along the way, though, he’d stepped into the fullness of his birth
name – Barack Hussein Obama.” Michelle does not note that, in all his
writings from 1958 to 1964, the Kenyan Barack Obama mentions nothing about an American wife and
Hawaiian-born son.
Dreams from My Father devoted
more than 2,000 words to the beloved “Frank,” whom the author identified as
Frank Marshall Davis. Becoming does
not mention Frank, so Michelle missed an opportunity to explain the devotion of
a black American to all-white Communist dictatorships.
Becoming portrays
the future president as an “exceptional” and “gifted” student who “worshipped
books.” At Columbia he “consumed volumes of political philosophy as if it were
beach reading” and “spent all his spare change on books.” Michelle managed to
marry an “out-of-the-box thinker” who “steered himself with a certainty I found
astounding.”
On page 148 readers meet
Valerie Jarrett, deputy chief of staff to Chicago mayor Harold Washington.
Valerie spent her childhood in her Iran, “where her father had been a doctor at
a hospital.” Michelle does not divulge that Valerie’s father, James Bowman, and
her father-in-law Vernon Jarrett were both Communists and
associates of Frank Marshall Davis.
“Valerie was the right
person to address any concerns,” Michelle writes. “Valerie was like a
fast-moving comet and clearly going places.” Jarrett went on to great power in the White House, a
de-facto First Lady on policy issues.
Michelle styles herself a “first mom” but
she does pronounce on her husband’s record and controversies.
The Rev. Jeremiah Wright
“was known as a sensational preacher with a passion for social justice.” In his
fiery sermons, Wright showed “callous and inappropriate fits of rage and
resentment of white America.” No word about Wright’s pal Louis Farrakhan or
the photo of her husband with
the Nation of Islam boss. And the dutiful Michelle never links Islam with
terrorism. As she explains, Nigerian girls were “kidnapped by the extremist
group Boko Haram.”
Michelle’s husband was “the
right person for this moment in history.” Republicans fought “every effort to
stanch the economic crisis, refusing to support measures that would cut taxes
and save or create millions of jobs.” Hillary Clinton was the designated
successor and Michelle “will always wonder about what led so many women, in
particular, to reject an exceptionally qualified female candidate and instead
choose a misogynist as their president.”
Readers might wonder what
Michelle is “becoming” now. The author claims, “I have no intention of running
for office, ever,” but even if she likes that plan she might not keep it.
At this moment in history,
Michelle may tear away that veil of impossibility and enter the race for 2020.
THE (REALITY) OF THE DEMOCRAT
PARTY:
Anti-Semitic, open borders for
cheaper labor and funded by criminal banksters… and these pols are making vast
fortunes sucking the blood of America!
We must not let them cheat their
way to power over the rest of us. Their ongoing vote fraud must be
stopped and the Democrats need to take a look at themselves and at what they
have become. It's not a pretty picture. What they have become
threatens to destroy the greatest nation on the planet and they are doing it on
purpose. They have nothing but contempt for the US as founded and
for those of us who love this country. PATRICIA McCARTHY – AMERICAN THINKER
“Then we suffered the rattling election of
Barack Obama, whose active membership in a white-, Jewish-, and America-hating
church was well known to the electorate. His close personal
relationship with the likes of his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis
Farrakhan was no secret. Obama was open about his
goals. He told us he was out to "fundamentally transform America"
and the world.” ALAN BERGSTEIN
“There is a deep racist and anti-Semitic disease in the leadership of
the Democrats. As Senator Cory Booker brings his hatred for the Jewish State to
the Senate, he should be asked whether he agrees with his hero, “The only good
Zionist is a dead Zionist we must take a lesson from Hitler”. DANIEL GREENFIELD
Clinton, a serial rapist, is welcomed to
McCain's funeral, as is his wife, who as a "manifest felon" is the
epitome of every unscrupulous behavior and trickery she can get away with by
committing fraud, harming American lives, and lying to the American public. By Eileen F. Toplansky
Former President Barack Obama said on Tuesday
that he was “very confident” he would have won a third term had the
Constitution and his wife allowed him to run again.
Speaking to his former top adviser
David Axelrod at a live recording of the “The Axe Files” podcast at the
University of Chicago, Obama said he believes
voters felt that he had “taken the job seriously, worked hard, been true to my
oath, observed and hopefully strengthened the norms and the rules and the
values of our democracy.”
“I feel very confident that I was in
a position—had it not been for both the Constitution and Michelle—to continue
in office,” Obama said.
Axelrod had earlier said that some
people would like Obama to serve in perpetuity and joked about some of Obama’s
supporters even wanting him to run for vice president.
The former president, though, added
that he is “not sure it is a healthy thing” to serve more than two terms,
pointing out that in countries without term limits, “even very good people…
lose their edge and get stale and comfortable in the position.”
Obama said it is “useful to have a
democracy have to continually evolve.”
Had Obama been allowed to run for a
third term, he would have faced off against Donald Trump in 2016. But when
Axelrod asked whether Obama believed he could defeat President Trump in 2020
in a hypothetical one-on-one matchup, Obama did not take the bait.
“I will not answer that direct
question for obvious reasons,” Obama said.
Here is what President Obama said on
the Ellen show on Abe Lincoln's birthday:
Since I came into office, we reduced
the deficit by two-thirds, but if you ask the average person, they're sure that
spending has shot up. And the reason is because there are a bunch of folks who
say that we're wildly overspending, even though we aren't.
Here are some actual numbers: in FY
2007, the last year President Bush and Republicans had 100% control of
Congress, federal spending including both wars was $2.7 trillion. The
budget President Obama just submitted is $4.1 trillion. That is up over
50% despite record-low interest rates and his continually bragging that he has
ended the wars. Median family income around the country is actually down
or flat, so I do not understand how the president could pretend that they
aren't overspending and taxing.
The deficit was down to $161 billion in FY 2007, including the
spending on the wars and because of President Bush's across-the-board tax cuts
in the summer of 2003. In FY 2003, federal income tax receipts had
decreased to around $900 billion prior to the tax cuts, due to a recession and
a collapsed stock market. By FY 2007, due to the stimulus of the tax
cuts, the economy rebounded, economic growth was substantial, unemployment was
way down (not because of a lower labor participation rate), and income tax
receipts had climbed to over $1.5 trillion. The tax rate cuts did not
cause receipts to go down, as Democrats and CBO had projected; they actually
skyrocketed by over 60%. The tax cuts obviously did not cause the
deficit.
The projected deficit for FY 2016 is projected to be over $500
billion. Think how high it would be if the Federal Reserve weren't
keeping the interest rates artificially low.
Despite the record-low interest rates and massive increases in
federal spending, economic growth has been some of the slowest on record after
a recession. Keynesian economics is obviously not that stimulating.
The president also continually says that his policies brought
us out of the great recession. The recession actually ended by
June 2009, four months and ten days after he took office. This is
obviously before any of his policies could have had any effect.
On February 10, in Springfield, Illinois, he gave a speech where
he said his opponents are not entitled to their own facts. It would be
nice if he paid attention to that lecture, and it would be great if the media
would call him out on his many false statements.
No comments:
Post a Comment