THE PIG PARASITE LAWYERS OF THE DEMOMCRAT PARTY OF BRIBES SUCKERING LAWYERS
The
main objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to
get elected; it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her.
There are people who govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and
the Clintons are the latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral
gains under Obama and the Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who
still care about their party still support the very people who have
brought it down.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual predator by others earlier.
THE BITCH IS BACK WITH ANOTHER HEAD!
THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium production in the U.S.
Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits
of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) (WHAT ABOUT THE CHINA BIDEN PENN CENTER?) and the Obama (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family (FOUR GAMER LAWYERS - JOE, HUNTER, JAMES, FRANK - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS AND LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK) corruption,
followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the
Warren (GAMER LAWYER) and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described
in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch
the surface of government corruption (ADD GAMER LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS (WANTS TO BE OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) AND HER LAWYER HUSBAND AND THE BANKSTERS’ RENT BOY, LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER, OWNED BY LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK WHO OWNS A BIG PIECE OF THE ‘BIG GUY’ JOE, AND GEORGE SOROS’ RENT BOY (GAMER LAWYER) TONY BLINKEN, AS WELL AS CON MAN (GAMER LAWYER) ADAM SHIFF) AND HIS CORRUPTNESS (GAMER LAWYER) BOB MENENDEZ STILL EVADING PRISON.
BRIAN C JOONDEPH
One
topic that Hillary is quick to criticize President Trump on is his
relationship with Saudia Arabia. It’s ironic given the Clinton
Foundation’s refusal to state that they will no longer accept financial donations from The Kingdom as others have.
His
(BILLARY CLINTON) wife is equally and personally devious and corrupt;
she had the fake “dossier” concocted she was certain would take Trump
out of the running for president in 2016. Hillary used her position as
Secretary of State to rake in millions of dollars to her phony Clinton Foundation, much of that money from other nations that sought to benefit from her largesse when President. PATRICIA McCARTHY
SAUDI DIRTY MONEY ENDS UP IN THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FAMILY SLUSH FUND
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
Jesse Watters: The Clintons' crooked connections
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnPSvkxKuLg
Man dragged out by his tshirt from Hillary Clinton event after he asked about Bill's 27 trips to Epstein Island
Some questions don't go away.
So when Hillary Clinton was asked about her husband Bill's 27 trips to Epstein Island, according to the flight records, by an audience questioner at an event, here's what came next:
They moved quickly. It's almost as if they were ready for people with these kinds of questions.
The security guards dragging the man out (he was a big fella so they needed multiple men) by his tshirt claimed that he was being thrown out because it was a private event. Based on the audience, it didn't appear that way.
And, there's no doubt he was pretty disruptive, not waiting his turn to ask his question, but shouting his question out loud. Notice the audience uproar in the tape.
But instead of just telling the guy to pipe down and wait his turn, or better still, answer the question, it seemed to be necessary at a Hillary Clinton event to drag the guy out, pulling him by his tshirt on the floor.
Can't have uncomfortable questions with Hillary Clinton in the room.
Which pretty well tells us that this is a Hillary Clinton event all right. Hillary positively specialized in 'I don't recall' and other evasions to thousands of uncomfortable questions throughout her career in public life. This response shouldn't surprise anyone.
The one thing it did do was draw attention to the issue -- that her husband Bill took dozens of trips to Epstein's pedophile island in the Caribbean and if he was doing what a lot of them were doing, he was having a good time with the underage girls, willing or not. Was he subject to blackmail for it? Epstein filmed everything so that's a valid question, and now Hillary is out and about, touting the Clinton good times to the public and doing post-presidential candidate things like speeches and book deals.
Epstein is not around now, having supposedly committed suicide in a New York City lockup, where somehow the cameras were off. What's more, Epstein's girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, did go to prison for human trafficking offenses, but not a single man who engaged in the pedophile activity hosted by Epstein has gone to prison alongside her, let alone gotten his name in the papers. That's why asking about Bill's role is important, and as inelegantly as the question was asked, it remains a valid question.
It highlights the wall of silence that still dogs the Epstein case with its open questions.
In fact, only one politician that we know of has been willing to breach that wall of silence that got the man dragged out of the hall by his tshirt -- Donald J.Trump. Here he is questioning the matter:
Maybe some of the answers to these questions should be forthcoming from the Hillary camp, given that she's out and about now, roping in the crowds and making money.
Do Global Elites Commit Crimes Against Children?
The
issue of how some of the most privileged people in the world treat
children is getting more traction. After the arrests of Jeffrey Epstein
and Ghislaine Maxwell, millions of ordinary people are critically
examining the actions of Hollywood celebrities, titans of business,
powerful politicians, media corporations, and other elite groups.
Scenarios that previously seemed unthinkable are becoming more thinkable
by the day.
Chrissy
Teigen is a popular model and actress who’s married to singer John
Legend. She enjoys a lucrative career appearing in commercials and TV
shows and hawking a product line at Target. She’s also a prolific writer
of tweets that feature her disturbing fantasies about children. Here
are some Chrissy tweets:
“I
just saw a baby that looked like a porn star. Like a trashy do-anything
porn star. Is this wrong to think?” and “seeing little girls do splits
half naked is just…. I want to put myself in jail. #toddlersandtiaras”
Chrissy Teigen in 2019
Photo credit: Adweek licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Recently, alert readers unearthed thousands of Teigen’s child-centered tweets and
started swarming Twitter with questions. Some of those questions probed
into whether Teigen ever had a relationship with the deceased child
trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Teigen responded by blocking one million
people, deleting 60,000 tweets, and claiming she was the victim of
heartless internet trolls. Conveniently for her, the media sided with
Teigen. This article in
USA Today, for instance, painted a sympathetic portrait of Teigen as an
innocent woman under vicious attack, while scrupulously avoiding
quoting any of Teigen’s actual tweets.
Who
could have imagined this bizarre photo of accused child trafficker
Ghislaine Maxwell and disgraced Oscar winner Kevin Spacey relaxing on
the thrones of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip? Yet, here it is. The Queen’s son, Prince Andrew, was a friend of Epstein for decades, and is currently wanted for questioning by
U.S. prosecutors. His relationship with Epstein was well-known in royal
circles but tolerated until Epstein’s arrest made it too uncomfortable.
In
fact, Jeffrey Epstein remained a highly sought-after companion among
the elite, even after his release from jail on sex offender charges. A
dinner at his New York mansion was attended by such media luminaries as Katie Couric, Chelsea Handler, and George Stephanopolous, whose wife just publicly urged parents to watch porn with their children.
And it wasn’t just media stars who loved Epstein. Bill Gates, who has endowed the world’s largest charitable organization, visited Epstein many times and maintained close ties through his staff. Harvard University gave Epstein his
own office, phone line, and unlimited access, after he donated $9
million for scientific research. And Harvard faculty visited Epstein in
his various homes and in jail and flew on his private planes.
As
the magnitude of the Epstein-Maxwell saga reaches the public, it’s
becoming harder for elites to haughtily wave away attention to their
behavior. In previous times, the story about Wayfair that raced across
social media last week might never even have surfaced. But in today’s
environment, this odd development inspired countless TikTok videos,
outraged tweets and media denials.
Wayfair
is a popular online purveyor of household goods, which attracted
interest when some internet sleuths noticed strangely labeled items.
Some ordinary looking cabinets, pillows, and baby goods were selling for
absurdly inflated prices. Even more remarkably, each item had an
unusual name which matched the name of
a recently missing kid. For instance, the Duplessis Zodiac pillow,
which was priced at $9,999.99, matched the name of 13-year-old Samara
Duplessis, who had just gone missing in Southfield, Michigan. The
Samiyah storage cabinet, retailing for $12,899.99, matched the name of
17-year-old Samiyah Mumin, recently missing from Columbus, Ohio.
Wayfair denied it. But internet investigators speculated that Wayfair was fronting for human trafficking operators
and continued to probe its personnel and history. But instantly, as
soon as the story broke, the media jumped in, proclaiming it a “false conspiracy” which was “baseless,” “unfounded,” and “debunked.” On what basis was the Wayfair story debunked?
The media remains remarkably uncurious about NXIVM, the sordid sex cult whose founder, Keith Rainiere, faces life in prison for sex trafficking. This grotesque saga has everything you could want for tabloid excitement: underage sex slaves, Hollywood stars, one of the richest families in
the world, connections to powerful politicians and the Dalai Lama. Yet
the public remains largely unaware of NXIVM. Has any journalist asked
Senator Kristin Gillibrand what her father was doing as an NXIVM member and its highly paid lawyer? Has anyone asked Hillary Clinton why sex cult members were illegally raising money for her campaign? Has anyone asked the Dalai Lama why
he took a $1 million fee to endorse a sex cult that branded women like
cattle? Have any mainstream journalists investigated what was being
done to children at NXIVM’s international day care centers?
Unfortunately, the elites’ unsettling relationship to crimes against children is too extensive to catalogue here. Oprah promoted Brazilian “holy man” John of God, now a convicted rapist who impregnated underage sex slaves to sell their babies on the black market. Meryl Streep led a standing ovation at the Oscars for Roman Polanski, who drugged and raped a 12-year-old girl. BBC boss Mark Thompson helped to cover up violent assaults by TV host Jimmy Savile, who attacked more than 500 children. Thompson is now CEO of the New York Times.
In
this unprecedented time when authorities are asking us to trust them as
they strip away our freedom, an honest appraisal of their
trustworthiness is long overdue. The American people deserve to know
what some of the privileged elites are doing to our children.
Filthy Rich – the Jeffrey Epstein Story
A new Netflix documentary series looks at the dark underbelly of the rich and infamous.
June 4, 2020
Mark Tapson
Mark Tapson is the Shillman Fellow on Popular Culture for the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
By
comparison to the history-making events of 2020, the sordid saga of
shadowy, uber-rich hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein, whose
sex-trafficking trial temporarily dominated the news cycle last year,
now seems foggily distant and even insignificant. His suspicious suicide
while in custody spawned conspiracy theories and internet memes, and
then – just as suspiciously – any highly-anticipated exposés of the rich
and powerful who might have cavorted with underage girls on Epstein’s
infamous “Orgy Island” disappeared into a black hole, and the news media
went back to hating President Trump.
Now Netflix has premiered a four-part documentary series titled Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich,
which raised expectations again that the mystery man and his web of
powerful acquaintances would be dragged into the cleansing light of day.
Based on the 2016 book Filthy Rich: The Billionaire’s Sex Scandal – The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein by
bestselling novelist James Patterson (journalists John Connolly and Tim
Malloy are credited as authors as well), the series instead just drags
viewers through the repellent Epstein’s mucky lifestyle but
unfortunately offers no new revelations or insights into the man or any
of his hedonistic friends in high places.
I
was primarily curious to see how the documentary would handle former
President Bill Clinton’s role in the controversy, partly because Epstein
buddy Clinton is conspicuously absent from the series trailer (see
below), and partly because author Patterson, who appears in the
documentary himself, has at least a professional relationship with
Clinton; they have collaborated on two thriller novels.
Hillary’s infamously predatory husband is indeed presented in the
documentary as being a friend of Epstein and as having flown on his
private jet over two dozen times, but all this was all common knowledge
before the Netflix series.
A
former Epstein employee does claim in the film that he saw Clinton on
his boss’ private island, and one of Epstein’s girls affirms that Bill
was there but “I never saw him doing anything improper.” Clinton
spokesperson Angel Urena has issued a blanket denial of
any insinuation that Bill ever participated in Epstein’s pedophiliac
shenanigans or even visited any of Epstein’s residences: “This was a lie
the first time it was told, and it isn’t true today, no matter how many
times it’s repeated.” Hillary unsurprisingly is neither seen nor heard
from in the series. That’s as far as the series delves into the
Epstein-Clinton connection.
Filthy Rich spends
more time covering disgraced British Prince Andrew’s involvement,
including showing footage of his epic fail of a BBC interview in which
he claimed that he couldn’t possibly be the “profusely sweating” man
described by one of Epstein’s girls because he was suffering from a
medical condition at that time that didn’t allow him to sweat. He also
claimed that he had no recollection of that same girl, whom he was
photographed hugging on Epstein’s island. An employee at the island also
asserts in the documentary that in 2004 he saw the Prince getting
frisky in a pool there with the same girl, who was topless. This new
salacious detail, however, is little more than an extra nail in the
coffin of Andrew’s public life.
The
show briefly features a few other figures either loosely associated
with Epstein or accused of complicity in what a prosecutor in the show
calls Epstein’s “molestation pyramid scheme.” Photos of him together
with Donald Trump appear repeatedly throughout the series, although none
of Epstein’s victims interviewed for the documentary ever suggested
Trump was a party to anything. Also among them is world-famous attorney
Alan Dershowitz, who represented Epstein during his prostitution
solicitation case in 2008 and who obtained for his client a “sweetheart
deal” of only 18 months, of which Epstein served only 13 in a
minimum-security facility before serving probation under the loosest
form of house arrest imaginable.
Dershowitz
was accused by Virginia Roberts Giuffre of having had sex with her
“multiple times” on Epstein’s private island. She is one of half a dozen
Epstein victims interviewed for the series, women who were underage at
the time and who ultimately went to law enforcement for help. But they
were powerless to damage the influential Epstein, who had the
connections and the money to shut down media exposés (such as a
whitewashed Vanity Fair profile)
and to avoid police investigations. Dershowitz vehemently denies
Giuffre’s account on-camera, and indeed, convincingly proved his
innocence in a lawsuit and then in a short book he wrote about it
called Guilt by Association.
In that book he speculated that Giuffre’s public accusation was part of
a scheme to buy her silence from privately-accused wealthy alleged
abusers by threatening to do to them what she had done to Dershowitz and
to Al and Tipper Gore (both also not guilty): accuse them publicly.
In
the process, Dershowitz appears to have demolished Giuffre’s
credibility, which tends to cast a shadow over at least her portion of
the Netflix series, in which she is the most prominently featured victim
(she was also, at the time, the same young girl at the center of the
allegations against Prince Andrew and who confirms she saw Bill Clinton
on Epstein’s island.)
The
final episode of the series focuses on how the #MeToo movement and
Epstein’s arrest empowered some of his victims to come forward with
their stories, only to be denied justice and closure when Epstein
presumably committed suicide in his jail cell. The series addresses the
suspicious circumstances of his death and presents details of an autopsy
that concluded it was more consistent with murder than suicide, but
again – nothing conclusive or new.
In the end, the Netflix series Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich is
an interesting-enough overview of his perverse tale, but it
unsatisfyingly avoids the revelations viewers hunger for about the
politicians, princes, and other notables in orbit around Epstein.
Besides the hundreds, and possibly thousands of girls whose lives were
inestimably damaged by Epstein and his alleged procurer girlfriend
Ghislaine Maxwell (who remains at large), the real tragedy is that
Epstein was at the center of a sex-trafficking nexus for the rich and
powerful, and the trail leading to their exposure came to a dead end in
his jail cell.
What We’ve Learned From Recent Allegations Surrounding Jeffrey Epstein
By Matt Stieb
Photo: Uncredited/AP/Shutterstock
The
coronavirus may have pushed the Jeffrey Epstein story off the front
pages, but in recent weeks fresh reporting and a trickle of new
allegations have kept the saga alive. In early May, a Harvard
University report shed
new light on the convicted sex offender’s relationship with the
institution. More recently, two newly released projects unearthed new
details about the deceased financier’s alleged sex-trafficking ring: a
four-part Netflix documentary, Filthy Rich, and a book by reporters Alana Goodman and Daniel Harper, A Convenient Death. Here are the new details these projects have unearthed.
Epstein’s Harvard ties were more extensive than previously known
A
27-page report released by Harvard University, the product of an
investigation by the school’s general counsel and an outside law firm,
outlines Harvard’s 25-year relationship with with Epstein. The financier
exploited these connections to rehabilitate his image following his
2008 sex-crimes conviction. Epstein had his own office at the school’s
Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, and had visited over 40 times between
2010 — when he was first released from custody — and 2018. According to the Boston Globe,
he was often accompanied on his visits by “young women who acted as his
assistants.” (The practice sounded quite similar to his frequent check-ins at
the M.I.T. Media Lab down the road in Cambridge, where an alumni
coordinator recalled asking the assistants “on the off chance” if they
weren’t there by choice.)
Bill Clinton allegedly visited Little St. James
Steve Scully – the former IT contractor on Epstein’s private island, Little St. James – has previously offered some details about what went on there, but in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich he
makes an explosive new allegation. Scully says that at some point
during his employment from 1999 to 2005, President Bill Clinton visited
Epstein on “Pedophile Island.”
“I
saw Bill Clinton sitting with Jeffrey on the living-room porch area,
which was Jeffrey’s favorite spot,” Scully said. “I saw no other guests
there at that time at all. I just thought, ‘Hey, wow, Jeffrey’s sitting
with Bill Clinton.’”
In
court documents, Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre also recalled seeing
the former president on the convicted sex offender’s island: “I remember
having a dinner with Clinton. He was there, and I never saw him do
anything improper … I wish, you know, he would just come clean about,
like, ‘Yeah, I was there. So what? Who cares? I didn’t see anything
going on.’” (According to a lawsuit filed
in January by the attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands against
Epstein’s estate, the financier had allegedly trafficked children as
young as 11 to the island.)
A
Clinton spokesperson denied such an appearance: “This was a lie the
first time it was told, and it isn’t true today, no matter how many
times it’s repeated,” said Angel Ureña. The two, however, were known to
be friends prior to Epstein’s initial arrest in 2005, and Clinton flew
on the financier’s private plane a total of 26 times, according to its flight logs.
Joseph Berlinger, the executive producer on Filthy Rich, told the Guardian that the project began in spring 2018 — prior to the Miami Herald’s pivotal Epstein reporting and the arrest of the financier in July. Berlinger said the inspiration for the project was James Patterson’s book on Epstein.
In another example of the close connections among the elite circles
Epstein traveled in — and a potential conflict of interest for a
documentary in which Patterson has an executive-producer credit —
Patterson is now writing his second political novel with Bill Clinton.
Bill Clinton allegedly had an affair with Ghislaine Maxwell
In A Convenient Death: The Mysterious Demise of Jeffrey Epstein,
authors Alana Goodman and Daniel Halper report that the former
president had an affair with Epstein’s alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell.
“[Clinton] and Ghislaine were getting it on,” a source who witnessed
the relationship told the authors. “That’s why he was around Epstein —
to be with her.” A spokesperson for Clinton denied this allegation as
well: “It’s a total lie today, it’s a total lie tomorrow, and it’ll be a
total lie years from now,” said Angel Ureña.
Allegations
of presidential impropriety aren’t new for Halper: An editor at the
Drudge Report, he has written critically about the Clintons in his first
book, Clinton Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine, in which he spoke with a source who alleged the former president was still cheating on his wife as of 2014.
NO ONE DOUBTS HILLARY IS A FUKING SOCIOPATH GAMER LAWYER!
Everyone
knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a
psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. DEBORAH
C TYLER
Tick...tick...tick -- The stench of Epstein closing in on Bill Clinton
Much
of the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophilia among the powerful
scandal has fallen onto Prince Andrew of U.K., an insignificant second
son of Queen Elizabeth II. The pervert's suicide, though, and the
increasingly suspicion-arousing circumstances point to much more
important people. As I've argued before, the media scrum around Andrew
seemed to be an attempt to deflect attention from more powerful players
involved with Epstein as the story burns out and the public loses
interest.
Beneficiary number remains is Bill Clinton, whose associations with Epstein are pretty astonishing. He's been listed on the flight logs of more than two dozen Epstein "Lolita Express" flights. He's been a regular at Epstein's "cowboy village"
in New Mexico with its group showers which, based on the word of
maintence staff, seemed to be all about perversion out of the public
eye. He's been seen with all those candy stripers.
Well,
now the lid's starting to bounce on that boiling pot, and maybe too
soon for Bill's tastes. The Sun of the U.K.'s new U.S. edition, now has
an astonishing series of photos of
Clinton livin' it up on Epstein's airplanes, Clinton posing with
Epstein's accused pimp, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Clinton whooping it up
with underage staff, generally partying hearty on the pervert's dime.
Yet to this day he claims to know nothing about what Epstein was about, never noticed a thing.
BILL
Clinton poses side-by-side with suspected pimp Ghislaine Maxwell - as
the pair board pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious private jet.
The former US President is seen smiling on the steps of the plane – dubbed the Lolita Express - next to Maxwell, in astonishing pictures exclusively obtained by The Sun.
All
it can do is raise suspicions about whether Epstein's prison "suicide"
was in any way authentic - a question that even (tick, tick, tick) 60 Minutes gave
credibility to, given the mounting evidence - and what Clinton might be
trying to hide. It's possible there are still pictures and cell phones
and other paraphernalia out there if it's not been preemptively
destroyed. (After all, if someone could have taken Epstein out to keep
him from talking, how much more likely they'd be to break and enter into
some of Epstein's redoubts to destroy the evidence.) It's conspiracy
stuff, sure, but it's linked to a strange chain of events.
Why on earth would Clinton hang out with a revolting human being like Epstein anyway? As Andrea Widburg has noted here,
it's almost as if the world's elites have some kind of power racket
going, given that pedophilia is all about power over the powerless.
Clinton himself was out of power when he started associating with the
monster, and his wife Hillary had it while he didn't. She even blithely
ignored him when he warned her to go to Wisconsin in 2016, which cost
her the election. His association had some kind of roots in power.
What's
really strange is why the media is so intent on protecting Bill.
Shouldn't he, and for that matter, his longtime enabler Hillary Clinton
be answering a few questions from the press. To date, they are amazingly
incurious. Yet as pictures like the Sun's get out, the clock is now
ticking.
Photo illustration by Monica Showalter with use of public domain sources.
Ed Buck Will Finally Face Trial, but His Conviction Is Far From Guaranteed
Charged
with the the deaths of two men who overdosed in his apartment, the
former Democratic operative’s path to punishment could be difficult and
uncertain
By
on
September 11, a black man whom the authorities are calling “Joe Doe”
hurried from a West Hollywood apartment to a nearby gas station and
asked the attendant on duty to call 911. A wealthy older man had
injected him with crystal meth, Doe said, and then refused to call an
ambulance when he began overdosing.
Thus
began a chain of events that resulted, at long last, in the arrest of
Ed Buck. By then the longtime Democratic Party operative was the target
of protest vigils, a wrongful death lawsuit, and a TV news stakeout.
Though two black men had been found dead of meth overdoses in his home
in a span of 18 months, and several others were telling investigators
that Buck had brought them into his residence and injected them with a
quantity of the drug that made them lose consciousness, local
prosecutors had resisted calls to make an arrest. The 911 emergency of
Joe Doe propelled the case suddenly forward out of what seemed, at least
to observers, an interminable lapse of inertia. Within days after Doe
was discharged from the hospital, Buck was arrested at his home by L.A.
County sheriff’s deputies and booked on state charges in connection with
Doe’s overdose. In Doe, investigators had a witness who had escaped
Buck’s apartment alive, and what he told them gave prosecutors the break
they needed to bring long-awaited charges in what was alleged to be one
of the most macabre L.A. crime sprees in years. At that point, however,
local prosecutors had competition.
Earlier
this year, at the invitation of the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department, a
federal drug task force opened an investigation into Buck’s alleged
crimes. Where L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey had previously
judged the evidence insufficient to charge Buck in the two overdose
deaths in his home, the United States attorney in L.A., Nicola Hanna,
saw things differently. In a whiplash turn of events over 48 hours, Buck
was arrested, charged in state court, and then promptly transferred to
federal custody and hit with a new set of charges in the deaths of
26-year-old Gemmel Moore and 55-year-old Timothy Dean.
This
summer, the legal drama of Ed Buck enters its improbable third act. The
notoriety of Buck, once famous as a well-connected political donor, has
long since eclipsed his renown. By the time he was handcuffed and
hauled away from West Hollywood in a sheriff’s vehicle, the name Ed Buck
had come to represent many things to many people: to local prosecutors,
he is a scourge; to black and LGBTQ activists, an avatar of status and
privilege; to the right wing, a cudgel with which to bash the Democrats;
and, to black gay men working as escorts in West Hollywood, a kind of
terrifying urban legend come to life. But while the case against him has
progressed, the path to conviction is difficult and uncertain.
The
Buck who appeared in court before federal Judge Frederick F. Mumm on
October 10 was a shadow of the political phenom who arrived in L.A.
three decades ago and became a major player in the local Democratic
Party. He stood, looking drawn and anxious in a loose beige prison
smock. When Mumm asked how he would plead to charges that he supplied
the methamphetamine that killed Moore and Dean, the defendant hesitated
for a long moment before responding: “I am working on one hearing aid.
Not guilty.”
Family
members of Moore and Dean attended the arraignment and assembled
outside court afterward. Moore’s mother, LaTisha Nixon, later called
Buck a “monster” and dismissed his apparent weakness as an act to gain
pity from the court. The families and their activist supporters have
long argued that Buck led a double life that protected him from the
consequences of his alleged crimes, likening him to a modern-day Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. “This was a really hard case for people in society
and politics to wrap their heads around,” says Jasmyne Cannick, an
L.A.-based media consultant active in the campaign that called for
Buck’s arrest. “Here you have this white man, an animal rights activist
who’s run for office and who seems like he’s a decent guy, a good
person. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde situation.”
It’s
not as if Buck hadn’t shown occasional glimpses of a darker side: He
has been the subject of several requests for temporary restraining
orders. And on at least two occasions, his vitriolic style convinced
deputies at West Hollywood’s City Hall to escort the targets of his
tirades to their cars after public meetings. Still, even to those who
had run afoul of Buck’s temper, the depth of his fall from grace is
astonishing.
“Here
you have this white man, an animal rights activist who’s run for office
and who seems like he’s a decent guy. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde situation.”
The
Ed Buck of the late 1980s was a charismatic gay political celebrity who
lead a quixotic crusade that helped bring down Evan Mecham, the
rancorous Republican governor of Arizona. The Arizona Republic said
Buck was “destined to go down in history as one of Arizona’s most
unlikely political figures.” After moving to L.A., Buck acclimated
quickly, forging political friendships with area congressmen, members of
the state Assembly and the City Council. He fostered golden retrievers,
railed against private development, and donated handsomely to scores of
Democrats, including all but one of the present members of the West
Hollywood City Council. But
the same 65-year-old who had grinned in photos with Hillary Clinton and
former Governor Jerry Brown was known to homeless men in WeHo’s Plummer
Park as “Dr. Kevorkian.”
Buck
was being held in early November without bond at the Metropolitan
Detention Center in downtown L.A. An official with the Federal Bureau of
Prisons declined to discuss the conditions of his confinement except to
say that Buck is not permitted visitors. In state court, where he faces
separate charges of operating a drug den and providing the drugs that
caused Joe Doe’s hospitalization for a drug overdose, Buck wore a
protective blue vest, the kind meant to prevent inmates from killing
themselves and protect them from attacks by other prisoners.
The
source of Buck’s wealth has always been shrouded in mystery. He claimed
he retired in his early 30s on proceeds from the “million-dollar” sale
of his business (he owned a service that provided driver’s license
information to auto insurers). A former friend told me that more
recently Buck has lived frugally off investment gains from the stock
market. Local prosecutors put forward a different theory, arguing in a
recent filing in state court that Buck “has no known source of income”
and “may be funding his lifestyle with narcotics trafficking.”
Since
2005 Buck has donated more than a half-million dollars to political
candidates and causes in Los Angeles. Though he was once a registered
Republican in Arizona, nearly all of his donations have been linked to
Democrats since he moved to West Hollywood in 1991. He has cut checks
for 40 officeholders in California, including several in L.A. City Hall,
the California Assembly, and Congress, the Los Angeles Times has reported. Some
of those politicos have returned the money or redirected it to
charitable causes after Buck’s arrest. Lacey returned the $100 donation
that Buck made to her 2012 campaign for district attorney. She has said
that she doesn’t know Buck and his modest largesse played no role in the
decision about whether to prosecute him.
Whatever
its source, Buck’s fortune seems depleted. Seymour Amster, the attorney
who began representing Buck after the death of Moore, is not listed as
his attorney in the federal case. Facing a possible life sentence in
federal prison, Buck has elected to be represented by a public defender,
at a cost of $500 a month, according to a court filing. Amster has
spoken for Buck in the press, saying that Moore’s death was “a tragedy,
not a crime,” which he attributed to Buck’s having “opened his home to
an individual who was troubled.” He referred to the activist campaign
against Buck as “a race war.” Amster appeared at Buck’s side in state
court, but that case is on hold until the federal case is completed,
says a spokesman for the DA’s office. Amster, who previously defended
the serial killer known as the Grim Sleeper, did not respond to messages
seeking comment.
When
Moore was found dead in Buck’s apartment in 2017, the initial
investigation by the Sheriff’s Department and coroner’s office treated
the overdose as an accident. A law enforcement source told Los Angeles that
this erroneous assumption contributed to errors that investigators
committed at the scene. A year later, when Lacey decided not to
prosecute Buck in Moore’s death, prosecutors listed “inadmissible search
and seizure” as one of the reasons. Lacey later told a meeting of the
Stonewall Democratic Club that investigators had illegally seized around
two grams of methamphetamine from a toolbox in Buck’s apartment.
Federal prosecutors later charged Buck with intentionally distributing
the drugs that killed Moore and Dean and three counts of drug
distribution. They must prove that the drugs provided by Buck were the
drugs that entered into the victims. Court documents in the federal case
make no mention of an illegal search.
Nearly
three weeks after Moore’s death the Sheriff’s Department reopened the
investigation as a possible homicide. It happened after Moore’s mother
and a young man who had worked as an escort for Buck aired their
suspicion that Buck had supplied and injected Moore with the drugs that
killed him. Nixon told a local reporter: “[Buck] would have my son … go
out to … Santa Monica Boulevard looking for young gay black guys so he
could inject them with drugs, see their reaction and how [they] would
react and take pictures of them.” The reporter, Ryan Gierach, had known
Buck for 14 years and knew of his meth use. “I needed no convincing,”
Gierach said. “Over 13 or 14 years I’ve seen a man, a vital, vigorous,
incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Buck
had once been a political mentor of sorts to Gierach, opening doors and
giving him inside information until the two had a falling out in 2015
after Buck refused to lend him money. Gierach incorporated Nixon’s lurid
allegations into a news feature that delved into Buck’s prominence in
the Democratic Party and included a recent photo of Buck with Clinton.
The Drudge Report promoted the story. The London tabloid The Daily Mail ran
its version under the headline: “Male prostitute, 26, dies of meth
overdose at Hollywood home of high-profile Democrat donor.” Fox News
seemed to embrace the story as a chance to attack multiple foes at once:
Democrats, the Clintons, and Hollywood. (On the night Buck was
arrested, Tucker Carlson reported the story with a photo showing Buck
with Hillary Clinton: “Turns out when Buck wasn’t donating to the
Democrats, he liked to inject young men with narcotics in his living
room.”)
“I’ve seen a man, a vital, vigorous, incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Entries
from Moore’s personal journal were published in various news outlets in
which he blamed Buck for getting him addicted to crystal meth. Moore
wrote in a December 2016 entry that Buck “gave me my first injection of
chrystal [sic] meth it was very painful, but after all the troubles, I
became addicted to the pain and fetish/fantasy.”
Eighteen
months after Moore’s death, Timothy Dean, a fashion consultant for Saks
Fifth Avenue who had performed in adult films, died of a meth overdose
in Buck’s living room. Nine months later Joe Doe fled Buck’s apartment
and ended up being treated at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for a drug
overdose.
Federal
prosecutors have the ability to charge Buck in the two deaths without
having to prove that killing them was his intent. The same statute is
being used to prosecute the men who sold the fentanyl-laced painkillers
that killed rap star Mac Miller. Lacey said in a statement that “there
is no comparable statute in California criminal law that my office could
have used to charge defendant Buck in either of the deaths.”
Investigators
eventually gathered testimony from at least nine men who said that Buck
had brought them to his home and insisted that they take drugs he gave
them as compensation for sexual services. Two of them reported that he
had injected drugs into their bodies while they were asleep. One of
those two men is Joe Doe.
With
the exception of Doe, local and federal prosecutors have differed over
the credibility of witnesses. Many have puzzled over how Buck had
avoided so much as a drug charge in the case. Nixon’s attorneys in a
wrongful death lawsuit against Buck have suggested that local
prosecutors were influenced by the fact that many of the alleged victims
were homeless, black, and sex workers. The federal trial of Ed Buck was
originally scheduled to begin November 26, but has been moved to next
summer.
RELATED: Federal Complaint Filed Against Ed Buck Contains Disturbing Details
And
there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't naive at all
about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible accuser
Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier.
She
is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally
corrupt, and these are her good qualities. KENNETH ELIASBERG
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Hillary the Punisher: Ronan Farrow says he was cut dead from Clinton circles after he exposed Weinstein
Apparently, the queen and her moneymen are not to be challenged.
Young Ronan Farrow learned that the hard way when he found out he was persona non grata from
charmed social circles of Hillary Clinton following his investigation
into Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein's long career of sexual
harassment and intimidation, an investigation which won him the Pulitzer
prize.
Which
culminates a long road of indignities for the young man. Seems the
threats from Weinstein's minions to him were not enough. Nor was the
rejection he encountered from assorted media organizations who refused
to run his work until the New Yorker finally picked it up. Nope, the
punishment Farrow endured also extended to House Clinton, which cut him
dead.
Which,
to the rest of us, seems like a good thing, given their long history of
moral turpitude. But to young Ronan, it was another sling and arrow,
because he was a Democrat and that was his social circle.
According to the Washington Examiner:
“It’s
remarkable how quickly even people with a long relationship with you
will turn if you threaten the centres of power or the sources of funding
around them,” Farrow told the Financial Times.
“Ultimately,
there are a lot of people out there who operate in that way. They’re
beholden to powerful interests and if you go up against those interests,
you become radioactive very quickly,” he said.
Clinton
appointed Farrow as her special adviser on global youth issues in 2011
when she was secretary of state. Farrow said he had worked with Clinton
“for years” when he was looking into the Weinstein story.
Instead
of praising young Ronan for standing up for the interests of
sex-harrassed women, for igniting the #MeToo movement, Hillary, that
supposed big champion of women's progress, shut him out, probably
refusing to take his calls, and in his view, solely on the grounds that
one of her most important moneymen was put out of commission. He was
dead to her.
And that tells us a lot more about Clinton than it does about Farrow.
It's
a reminder of Clinton's pay-to-play orientation, and privilege-of-kings
morality. Rules of decency do not apply to her. Women's rights, or
anyone's rights, are window dressing. Money talks. Maybe that can be
brought up next time someone bruits about her name for president again.
Everyone
knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a
psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.
Bill and Hill - and the Evil that Men Do
If
you asked one hundred people what they think about when they hear the
name Bill Clinton, a goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few
will use the dreadful word rapist. And that number will increase. Time
and neurology are working against the Clintons.
Most
memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to
associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the
brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and
to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember
Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has
tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example,
disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John
Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the
outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be
reported.
People
tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh
because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no
benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed
his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her
political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary
will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered
with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown,
Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those
one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their
legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
If
you asked one hundred people what they think about when they hear the
name Bill Clinton, a goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few
will use the dreadful word rapist. And that number will increase. Time
and neurology are working against the Clintons.
Most
memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to
associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the
brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and
to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember
Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has
tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example,
disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John
Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the
outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be
reported.
People
tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh
because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no
benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed
his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her
political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary
will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered
with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown,
Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those
one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their
legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser
As
one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover from
having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound
that she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention.
She has come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every
one but the real one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a
total loser. She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. In
addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has
absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills ( she’s very easy
to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of her
deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen
to advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose!
Thank God -- a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in
America’s coffin.
We
could go through the litany of Hillary Clinton’s failures – Cattlegate,
Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, her clumsy and opaque handling of the
health care assignment her husband handed her, her tour of duty in the
U.S. Senate, or her stint at the State Department, starting with her
failure to get the Russian word for “reset” correct and ending with her
dereliction of duty in the case of Benghazi (which produced four dead
Americans, including her “friend” Ambassador Christopher Stevens),
which, on testifying before Congress, she fobbed off with “what
difference, at this point, does it make?”
But,
for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the liberties that
she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New York Times called her a congenital liar, he flattered her. You see, the Clintons don’t just tell lies, they live them.
Consider
her most recent whopper -- the one in which she observed, on being
asked what was her most difficult decision, that it was remaining in her
marriage. Why was this her biggest whopper? Because she had no choice
but to remain in her marriage, if, indeed, the arrangement that the
Clintons have qualifies as a “marriage,” rather than a political
partnership looking to advance the ambitions of each of the partners.
Some
have applauded her incredible loyalty to Bill in view of his tawdry
behavior. However, if all they had was an “arrangement” to advance their
ambitions, his infidelities were irrelevant as far as hurt feelings
were concerned.
But
they were necessary to make her both the object of sympathy (although
one has to wonder why you are deserving of pity on your husband’s
1000th marital transgression). Also, every time he got caught, so it
goes, he owed her one. Ergo, the health care assignment, her Senate
term, and, finally, her stint as Secretary of State. In each of these situations she distinguished herself more for her failures than any accomplishment.
The
point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her marriage.
Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be nominated
for, let alone be elected to, dog catcher of even the smallest of
communities. Her successes in securing all of these positions was
achieved by attaching herself to Bill’s coattails and riding them to
each one of these positions.
So
why did Hillary lose the 2016 Presidential election? Because she’s
Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton
belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.
BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why
is no one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary
Viciously went after. The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly
stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women on record telling their stories of
him sexually assaulting them starting back in college! Imagine all the
women who still have never told their stories about him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
Ronan Farrow: Bill Clinton ‘Credibly’ Accused of Rape, Investigation Is ‘Overdue’
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/03/ronan-farrow-bill-clinton-credibly-accused-of-rape-investigation-is-overdue/
3 Nov 20192,510
2:29
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that “credible” accusations of rape had
been made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick,
adding that an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”
Maher asked Farrow,
who is best known for helping uncover the Harvey Weinstein sexual
assault scandal, whether Clinton could have survived in today’s
political climate of hyper-awareness about sexual misconduct.
“I
think that it is very important to interject that Bill Clinton is a
different conversation,” responded Farrow. “He has been credibly accused
of rape. That has nothing to do with gray areas. I think that the
Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting.”
Broaddrick,
a former nursing administrator, first made the allegations against
Clinton in 1999, claiming that he raped her in her hotel room in Little
Rock in 1978, when he was Arkansas attorney general and running for
governor. Clinton has denied the allegation through his attorney.
Farrow recently accused Hillary Clinton in his best-selling book Catch and Kill of
pressuring him during his investigations into Harvey Weinstein’s
behavior. According to Farrow, Clinton’s publicist Nick Merrill
described the story as “a concern” for her reputation.
Meanwhile, Maher also pressed Farrow on longtime rumors that
he is the son of singer Frank Sinatra, with his mother Mia Farrow
having been romantically involved with the singer and the pair bearing a
strong physical resemblance.
“Now,
what do you think your father would think about what you’re doing now?”
Maher asked Farrow, in reference to his investigative reporting.
“I knew I was walking into that so I asked,” Farrow said. “I didn’t want to give you the sound-bite of ‘Which one?’”
In 2013, Mia Farrow said in an interview with Vanity Fair that Sinatra could “possibly” be her son’s biological father.
“I feel like there’s no one more #MeToo-y than Frank Sinatra,” Maher said, asking. “You do own a mirror, don’t you?”
Farrow
eventually admitted that he “doesn’t know” what Sinatra would have
thought of his journalism, but joked that Maher could “ask my mom” for
answers.
Follow Ben Kew on Facebook, on Twitter at @ben_kew, or email him at bkew@breitbart.com
Where were the HOWLERS when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the prowl?
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the
expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do
it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are
amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and
money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
Leaked Julian Assange Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected, Sadistic Sociopath’
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the
expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do
it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are
amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and
money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
Hillary, Billary, Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Harvey Weinstein and their boy Obomb….. new definitions of
degradation and sleaze.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-sleazeters-hillary-clinton-says.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the
expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do
it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are
amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and
money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
DO YOU GET SICK AND TIRED OF HOLLYWOOD’S STAGGERING HYPOCRISY???
RICH LIBERALS AND THEIR CELEBRATES P IMPS AND PERVS
…. The parasitism of Hillary, Billary, Obomb, Heffner, Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Weinstein and the rest.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/10/rich-liberals-and-their-celebrated.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Former
President Bill Clinton speaks during a plenary session at a Clinton
Global Initiative meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on May 6, 2015.
(Abdeljalil Bounhar/AP Photo)
Bill Clinton Accusers Speak Out After Ronan Farrow Says Ex-President Was ‘Credibly Accused of Rape’
November 6, 2019 Updated: November 6, 2019
Share
Juanita Broaddrick, who has long accused former President Bill Clinton of sexual assault, said that she agrees with comments made by reporter Ronan Farrow.
Farrow
wrote the book “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies and a Conspiracy to Protect
Predators,” touching on NBC News’ attempts to silence his reporting
about Harvey Weinstein. He told “Real Time with Bill Maher”
that Broaddrick had credibly accused Clinton of rape.
“Bill
Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of
rape … That is, I think the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue
for revisiting,” he said on Nov. 1.
He
was answering a question from Maher, who asked a panel, “Could Bill
Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998 survived today? Or would his
own party have thrown him under the bus?”
According to the Daily Caller, three women who have accused Clinton of assault, including Broaddrick, said they are hoping for justice.
Clinton has denied all of the allegations.
“I
always have thought that this should be revisited. … I would like for
something to be done in order to expose this man for all of the things
that he has done and possibly get all of his past presidential perks
taken from him,” Broaddrick told the website. “That would be my biggest
goal, because I don’t think anything else can be done after 40 years.”
Then-Republican
presidential candidate Donald Trump (C) sits with, (L-R)Paula Jones,
Kathy Shelton, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey, before the
second presidential debate with Democratic presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton at Washington University in St. Louis, on Oct. 9, 2016.
(Evan Vucci/AP Photo)
Broaddrick said that the allegations of assault never amounted to anything because of the power he wielded.
“I
think it’s because of who it was,” she said. “[Lauer and others] are
all lower characters. Who should have been exposed was the president of
the United States.”
She accused him of rape when he was campaigning for governor of Arkansas in 1978.
Leslie
Millwee, another Clinton accuser, told the Daily Caller that she was
pleased to hear Farrow’s interest in the allegations.
“I
absolutely agree that it’s long overdue. … I think that more things are
going to come to light,” Millwee said. “I’m really excited that Ronan’s
looking into it. I was sexually assaulted three times by Bill Clinton …
and I would not only like for Juanita to get justice, you know, I’d
like to get justice. I’m elated that he’s looking into this.”
“I
don’t care what your political affiliation is—whether you lean left or
right—sexual assault is bad and wrong and it should be looked at in that
way, and nothing to do with political affiliation,” said Millwee, a
former Arkansas reporter.
And
Kathleen Willey, a former aide in the White House, said that she
doesn’t believe Farrow’s interest in the topic will actually lead to
charges against Clinton.
“The
world knows that the Clintons have everybody in their back pocket, and I
just don’t know who’s willing to come forward and take something like
that on,” she told the news outlet. “I certainly agree with what Ronan
Farrow said. … What does ‘revisit’ mean? Is the [district attorney]
going to look into this? Is the special counsel?” Willey said. “It’s
been 40 years, and I can’t see anybody picking the ball up and running
with it.”
Willey
claimed that Clinton assaulted her in 1993 in the Oval Office while she
volunteered as an aide, according to Business Insider. Clinton denied
the allegations.
Millwee
alleged that the former president sexually assaulted her in 1980
several times at the television station where she worked. She came
forward with the allegations in 2016, speaking to Breitbart.
Clinton
eventually was impeached in 1998 by the House of Representatives for
lying under oath and obstruction of justice following the publication of
his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
The Senate ultimately acquitted him in 1999 and he served out his second term until January 2001.
O.K., Prince Andrew's out of public life. Why isn't Bill Clinton?
The
press is making a big deal out of Britain's Prince Andrew now being
ousted from public life, based on his pretty gamy associations with
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He had his hand draped around the bare
midriff of a 17-year old, in one photo. He kibbitzed with Epstein after
his Florida slap-on-the-wrist conviction and there's a photograph there,
too. Flight records show he rode the Lolita Express. And incredibly, he
claims he never knew anything untoward was going on.
A little rich there, old chap. Or very, very, naive...
U.K.'s Daily Mail has this comprehensive report, reasonably explored from a U.K. perspective. But the U.S. press has been all over it, too. Here's CNN, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, CNBC, Time, Fox News...
It's
good clean fun for the American press, given that the British royal
family is unimportant here, and relies on a pristine public image to
maintain U.K. public support which is pretty incompatible with jetting
around with Epstein, but it also raises questions about why that other
famous friend of Epstein's, Bill Clinton, who rode the Lolita Express
again, and again, and again, isn't getting the same pariah treatment.
Fact is, the press hasn't brought the disgusting thing up at all, even
as Clinton's wife (and daughter) gallivant around the country on a
thinly disguised campaign for Hillary as president.
Joe
Biden's gotten all kinds of questions based on his son Hunter's gamy
business dealings. But Hillary Clinton remains immune -- and not a word
has been said in the media about hubby Bill, who's still carrying on his
public life as usual. It's as if he's out of the picture, and all those
denials he's thus far made are simply factual ... albeit about as
factual as Prince Andrew's denials.
And
there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't naive at all
about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible accuser
Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier. Someone
like Clinton turning up with Epstein, is pretty obviously a matter of
public interest, particularly with his wife's presidential ambitions.
Just recently, one of Clinton's accusers, Juanita Broaddrick, gave this
interview to Australia's Sky News, bringing up the constant issues with
the much-vaunted Democratic ex-president, and still seeking justice.
She's not getting any so far:
My interview with Sky News Australia this evening
MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6108127574001 …
MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia
It’s
“disheartening” the Me Too movement "never wanted anything to do with
the victims of Bill Clinton” according to a woman who claims the former
President raped her. Juanita Broaddrick alleges Mr...
skynews.com.au
3,058 people are talking about this
Which
brings up again why Clinton isn't getting any attention, let alone
ostracization, on his well-known relationship with Epstein. Why not? The
Brit press is interested in British angles, the American press should
be similarly interested in American angles. But only Prince Andrew gets
the full press attention. Maybe that's because he's not a Democrat to
protect?
It
just shows the press's credibility problem in conveniently attempting
to protect another Democrat from any uncomfortable questions.
Is someone gonna ask the Clintons about all those trips to Epstein's 'cowboy village'?
The
press is piling on against the U.K.'s Prince Andrew, who's been
probably credibly accused of participating in "suicide" pervert Jeffrey
Epstein's sex-with-little-girls operations.
Yes,
it's wretched and appalling. It's bad for a royal family that for
decades has portrayed itself as the embodiment of middle-class
values. This is Shaka Zulu or Genghis Khan territory.
But
it's also of limited interest, given that Prince Andrew is not even
important in the royal succession lineup, and frankly, who cares what
some rich overseas princeling is up to? The media sure didn't, up until
now.
There's
likely a reason for it — to deflect attention from the growing evidence
that Bill, Hillary, and even Chelsea Clinton have had a pretty
spectacularly intense association with the very same pervert.
The
Daily Mail has been on the job and has found another credible witness, a
former contractor of Epstein's at his New Mexico "cowboy village" ranch
who says the Clintons jetted in annually on Epstein's Lolita Express
and had a grand old time on Epstein's many-camera'ed grounds. Some
opening points from the Mail:
· Bill
and Hillary Clinton would stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico ranch
frequently after they left the White House, former estate workers told
DailyMailTV
· The
former president was Epstein's closest 'celebrity mate' and the
Clintons visited Zorro Ranch 'a whole bunch of times', a former
contractor who ran the IT system at the property said
· The
family never stayed in the main house but bunked down in a special
cowboy-themed village created by Epstein, which lies a mile south of his
own villa, sources said
· The
guest homes are next to other traditional Wild West-style buildings
such as an old schoolhouse and saloon bar, which are all near Epstein's
private airstrip, where he arrived on his private planes
And
to read the details of the report is enough to give the gross-outs to
anyone. Why were the Clintons going to a place Epstein called his
"baby-making ranch"? What was that about Epstein having an eight-person "party shower"? Did the Clintons do the "party shower"? Was
it on film? How many times? And who else was in the pen with
them? What about that party room with the stripper poles? Did the
Clintons go there, too? What was the Secret Service thinking, or did
Bill bug out again on his Secret Service? And why are taxpayers paying
for this farce?
Why again did Epstein have that icky portrait of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress on his Manhattan mansion wall?
As one of the contractors who witnessed this, Jared Kellogg, told the Mail:
'My
contact was Brice, their main concern was that there was no video
surveillance on the property at all. I thought this was a simple
request, as they wanted surveillance to protect their investment. It's a
huge site.
'But
what was weird was that the whole time I was on site, Brice would be
bragging about how the Clintons would visit, the whole family. Not just
Bill, but Bill, his wife, their kid, and they would stay on the ranch
itself.
More ickiness about Epstein's obsession with cameras:
Instead
of using an expensive, robust camera system, which used underground
cables, he wanted a 'point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design', which
means cameras are operating via antenna, and is considerably cheaper.
After Kellogg did an estimate and sent in a plan, he never heard back.
He
said: 'They had this huge facility, but it felt like they didn't have
the money to do anything. They were trying to find the most
cost-effective way to transmit video footage and we had to come up with a
point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design because normally we want to
trench everything. It saves money as you don't have to build a trench
and put in a cable.
Sound like someone who's been blackmailed? You decide.
Now,
arguably, one could argue that the press is saying nothing about this,
given that the contractor was a different kind of witness from Virginia
Giuffre, the credible young woman who says Epstein trafficked her with
Prince Andrew when she was a teenager.
But
the Mail slips in something that hasn't appeared significantly in the
press at all: that Giuffre also says she saw Bill Clinton at Epstein's
pervert haunts being honored by the pedophile himself.
Why
aren't the media covering that? Now we have the Clintons pinned at two
places — the "cowboy ranch" and the Caribbean pervert island — and no
one's saying anything. It's all about Prince Andrew.
Yet
Eptein was obsessed with cameras and obviously blackmail. He roped in
Prince Andrew. But the real question is to what extent he got the
Clintons. With all these new revelations rolling out, why is the press
silent?
Image credit: Photo montage by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
Convicted sex offender and Mueller witness George Nader indicted for illegal contributions to boost Hillary Clinton
Convicted
sex offender George Nader, who was a key witness in special counsel
Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, has been indicted by United
States prosecutors for his alleged role in a scheme to conceal large
sums of illegal campaign contributions to help Hillary Clinton in the
2016 election.
Nader,
a 60-year-old Lebanese American lobbyist, is accused of conspiring with
Ahmad “Andy” Khawaja, the Los Angeles-based 48-year-old chief executive
of Allied Wallet, to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in
campaign contributions to political committees associated with a
presidential candidate to gain influence during and after the 2016
campaign.
Nader
and Khawaja were charged on Nov. 7 as part of a 53-count indictment
dealt by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia. The
indictment was unsealed on Tuesday.
Khawaja
gave more than $4 million to Clinton's campaign and other Democrats
during the 2016 cycle but later donated $1 million to President Trump's
inaugural committee after Clinton lost, according to the Associated Press.
As he shifted his focus to Republicans after the 2016 election, the
Lebanese-born Khawaja met with Trump at a Manhattan fundraiser and got a
photo with the president in the Oval Office.
The
Justice Department announced on Tuesday that Khawaja allegedly
conspired with Nader to make $3.5 million in straw donations to boost a
presidential candidate from March 2016 through January 2017.
No
candidate is mentioned by name, but the indictment and campaign finance
records make it clear that the money was directed towards helping
Clinton during the 2016 campaign.
"By
design, these contributions appeared to be in the names of Khawaja, his
wife, and his company. In reality, they allegedly were funded by
Nader," Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski of the Justice
Department’s Criminal Division and FBI Washington Field Office chief
Timothy Slater announced in a statement.
"Khawaja
and Nader allegedly made these contributions in an effort to gain
influence with high-level political figures, including the candidate. As
Khawaja and Nader arranged these payments, Nader allegedly reported to
an official from a foreign government about his efforts to gain
influence," they continued.
According to the indictment, after
the election Khawaja used his company to steer $1 million to Trump's
inaugural committee and attended Trump's inauguration with Nader.
The
other charges in the indictment allege Khawaja and six associates — Roy
Boulos, Rudy Dekermenjian, Mohammad “Moe” Diab, Rani El-Saadi, Stevan
Hill, and Thayne Whipple — conspired to conceal executive contributions,
totaling more than $1.8 million, to various political committees in
2016 through 2018. "Among other things, these contributions allegedly
allowed Khawaja to host a private fundraiser for a presidential
candidate in 2016 and a private fundraising dinner for an elected
official in 2018," Benczkowski and Slater said.
Khawaja
is also charged with obstructing the grand jury investigation in the
summer by providing a witness called to testify in the case with false
information about Nader and his connection to Khawaja’s company, while
four of his associates are charged with obstruction by lying to the FBI.
Nader is already in federal custody on other charges. In July, he was charged with
sex trafficking for allegedly transporting a 14-year-old boy from
Europe and then abusing him. Nader pleaded not guilty in federal court
in Alexandria, Virginia.
Part
of a rap sheet dating to the 1980s, Nader pleaded guilty in 1991 to a
federal child porn charge involving footage of 13- or 14-year-old boys
and received a six-month sentence, served at a Baltimore halfway house.
Nader
acted as a connection between Trump’s circle and Russian, United Arab
Emirates, and Saudi Arabian officials in 2016 and 2017 as he pursued
business deals in the Middle East. This included helping to set up a
January 2017 meeting in the Seychelles between Trump associate and
Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian official with close ties to
Russian President Vladimir Putin.
As reported by the Washington Examiner, records indicate Nader visited the White House at least 13 times to meet with Trump’s then-chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Nader was interviewed by Mueller's team on multiple occasions regarding possible UAE efforts to influence members of Trump's campaign, and was mentioned in Mueller's final report more than 100 times.
An attorney for Nader declined to comment to the Washington Post, and an attorney for Khawaja could not immediately be reached by the outlet.
Federal Election Commission records detail the millions of dollars Khawaja admitted donating to Democratic candidates, campaigns, and political action committees.
Khawaja
told the Federal Election Commission he donated $2,700 in October 2015
and $2,700 in July 2016 to Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary
for America. He said he donated $135,000 in March 2016, $150,000 in
April 2016, $68,400 in June 2016, and $60,000 in September 2016 to the
Clinton campaign’s joint fundraising committee, the Hillary Victory
Fund. The records also show a donation totaling $200,400 in July 2016 to
the Hillary Action Fund, a joint fundraising effort between Clinton’s
campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
Khawaja
told the FEC about donations to the DNC totaling $231,100, in addition
to donations to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee totaling
$33,400 in 2016 and $43,900 in 2017 and the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee totaling $233,400 in 2016, $230,000 in 2017, and
$237,300 in 2018.
Khawaja
also reported donating massive sums to liberal PACs, including
$1,100,000 to Priorities USA Action, the primary super PAC supporting
Clinton's campaign, and $100,000 to Senate Majority PAC in 2016. He also
donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Senate and congressional
races around the country with a special focus on his home state of
California, including $4,200 in 2016 and $3,900 in 2017 to Schiff for
Congress, the campaign committee for House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff.
In addition, Khawaja’s company, Allied Wallet, reported giving
$550,000 to the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee, the Democratic
National Convention’s fundraising arm, in July 2016. The business also
donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democratic super PACs in
2017 and 2018.
FEC records show Nader reported giving $595 in donations to
Trump’s presidential campaign committee in 2016, as well as $100
dollars to Ben Carson's campaign, but not to any Democrats that election
cycle.
Nader was a business associate of Elliott Broidy, a top Republican fundraiser and deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee who resigned from
that position in April 2018 after reports that Trump lawyer Michael
Cohen negotiated a $1.6 million settlement in 2017 between Broidy and a
former Playboy model who said Broidy impregnated her. Nader and Broidy
worked to influence U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East prior to Broidy's resignation and Nader's arrest in June.
Is that you, Bill Clinton? New book says Epstein blackmailed politicians
Jeffrey
Epstein was a bizarre creep. Not only was he a pedophile, but he
seemed to be drawn to pulling in famous people to his pedophilery, in
the interests of blackmail.
A
new book lays out how strange it was, stating that Epstein got his
entire spy operation from the media empire of the late Robert Maxwell, a
sleazy tabloid-media character who was Epstein girlfriend Ghislane
Maxwell's father, and who died under mysterious circumstances himself on
his yacht, years ago. Apparently, he was useful to the Mossad for
blackmailing politicians, so they all had some kind of relationship, and
Epstein, a pedophile, was brought in. Here's an interesting review
with excerpts from Medium:
According
to the former spy, the ultimate order to embrace Epstein and involve
him in the ongoing arms deals came from "the bosses" at Israeli
intelligence headquarters.
"They were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services," he told James Robertson.
"Later
on [Ghislaine] got involved with Israeli intelligence together with
him. But not in this arms deal with Iran business," Ben-Menashe also
told Zev Shalev, former CBS News executive producer and investigative journalist for the website Narativ.
"These
guys were seen as agents. They weren't really competent to do very
much. And so they found a niche for themselves — blackmailing American
and other political figures."
He
told Robertson, "Mr. Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around
providing girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States. See,
f------ around is not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it's not a
crime. But f------ a fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he was
taking photos of politicians f------ fourteen-year-old girls — if you
want to get it straight. They would just blackmail people, they would
just blackmail people like that."
This,
if true, tells us two things: that Epstein was able to get away from
the long arm of the law due to politics, but he also may have had some
nefarious sway over a lot of politicians, what with his tabloid spy ties
via House Maxwell and, apparently, the Israeli spy apparat, too.
So
imagine a guy like Bubba Clinton strolling into this and indulging his
enormous appetites, and not a clue as to the forces circling him.
If
even a scintilla of this is what was going on, there may be forces out
there with the wherewithal to rub out Epstein in his prison, as well as
hold enormous sway over many gullible and immoral Western politicians.
It
once again raises questions as to where Bill Clinton was in all
this. He's intersected the Epstein world all too often for something of
this nature not to ensnare. And with a compliant media establishment,
he's still getting away with saying nothing was going on.
Image credit: Photo illustration by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
How Stupid Do They Think We Are?
These
days it seems like coincidence abounds in the precincts of leftism. And
an unquestioning Deep State Media are only too happy to label anyone
who points out the absurdities of the supposed coincidences as
“conspiracy theorists,” having long ago abandoned journalistic
inquisitiveness for allegiance to a political ideology.
A
few examples spring to mind: Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed suicide; a
“chance” encounter on June 27, 2016 on the tarmac of Phoenix’s Sky
Harbor International Airport between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch
and former President Bill Clinton, whose wife would be interviewed by
FBI agents over her illegal email server five days later; and the
failure by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to find “political
bias” in the initiation of the Obama administration’s outrageous and
utterly illegal spying operation on the Trump presidential campaign and
presidency.
Take
the case of the “suicide” of Jeffrey Epstein. There’s a reason the
phrase “Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself” being tacked onto otherwise
disconnected topics by people making public statements became a
hilarious meme for a while. At the core of all good humor is an unspoken
truth. It was a populist way of saying, “We’re not buying what you fake
news media types are selling anymore.” And the flat-footed responses of
the Deep State Media reporters confronted by these unexpected “Jeffrey
Epstein didn’t kill himself” truth bombs were the best part of all.
At an LSU-Alabama football game that President Trump attended, MSNBC reporter Monica Alba asked a Trump-voting student on
live television, “What [Trump] policies stand out to you?” The young
man gamely replied, without cracking a smile or missing a beat, “Just
mainly the no-nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein
didn’t kill himself.” Alba
visibly had difficulty maintaining her composure but being part of
today’s toadying Fourth Estate that must protect the Clintons at all
cost, dutifully ignored the student’s non sequitur tweak and edto
another question.
Caleb Hull
✔@CalebJHull
MSNBC REPORTER: “What [Trump] policies stand out to you?”
ALABAMA STUDENT: “Just mainly the no nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.”
34.6K
2:53 PM - Nov 9, 2019 · Washington, DC
10K people are talking about this
She
gets the joke, but knows she can’t acknowledge it, as the word has gone
out to the entire corporate media class that no one is allowed to
question the circumstances of the death of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein,
who was as thick as thieves with Bill Clinton.
And
the circumstances of Epstein’s supposed “suicide” are so outrageously
questionable that any sentient person looking at the facts would have to
have undergone a lobotomy not to conclude that a giant scam and
cover-up occurred in relation to his death. But Epstein’s ability to
expose rich and powerful liberals like Mr. Clinton, Prince Andrew and
who knows how many others in his web of sexual perversion meant that the
Bat Signal had to go out to Deep State Media members everywhere that no
discussion of the possible murder of Epstein could be tolerated.
Consider
the “coincidences” and anomalies that took place in Epstein’s final
days and hours. Here you have the most high-profile criminal defendant
in the United States, who had explosively damaging information on sexual
predations involving perhaps scores or hundreds of the world’s most
elite and powerful occurring aboard Epstein’s private 727 jet dubbed
“The Lolita Express,” at his Caribbean estate wags nicknamed “Orgy
Island,” at his sprawling New Mexico would-be baby farm, and at his
Manhattan manse.
He
finally ends up in jail at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center
in the custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons. He then supposedly
attempted to kill myself but survived, yet was taken off suicide watch
after only six days. Then lo and behold, both guards assigned to check
on him fell asleep – simultaneously – and missed their rounds, both
cameras trained on the area around Epstein’s cell failed,
simultaneously, and the night before his death, Epstein’s one cellmate
inexplicably was removed from the cell.
After
his body was found on August 10, 2019, an autopsy performed by the
city’s Chief Medical Examiner’s office determined the cause of death to
be suicide after only five days, even before all of the evidence has
been collected. Famed pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who attended the
autopsy at the behest of Epstein’s brother, gave a must-see interview to
Fox News. He noted that the three bones fractured in Epstein’s neck
were indicative of homicide, not suicide. Baden said that Epstein’s neck
“had been crushed.” It was not the result of a ligature (like a noose
made from bedsheets), as was claimed. He noted the scene of the death
appeared staged to suggest suicide.
Yet,
the Deep State Media pushed the suicide narrative nonetheless,
pooh-poohing anyone who suggested otherwise. They attacked the esteemed
Dr. Baden for questioning the Epstein autopsy, with New York Magazine describing
him as having “demi-celebrity status” and being fond of
“self-aggrandizement.” Never mind the fact pattern he points to that is
wildly divergent from a “suicide” determination. But this is our
corporatist media today. Accept the Deep State narrative and move on.
Then
we have Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton “bumping into” each other at the
culmination of the FBI’s pseudo-investigation into Hillary Clinton’s
outrageously criminal conduct in running highly classified government
records over a ridiculously unsecure personal server, surely in
violation of the Espionage Act and Federal Records Act, if not other
laws.
The
advance planning that goes into the travel of both a former president
and a current Attorney General by their protective details and logistics
personnel is immense. Two such officials do not simply have their
respective airplanes sidle up to each other on the tarmac of an airport
like you might bump into an old high school chum at Starbucks. The
impropriety of the Attorney General meeting privately with the spouse of
the subject of a high-profile FBI investigation was off the charts.
But, we were told, they just discussed golf outings and grandchildren.
Nothing to see here either folks. And the likes of CNN dutifully reported that it was only congressional Republicans who saw fit to question the circumstances.
And finally, we have DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifying to the Senate that,
“We found no bias” on the part of those who initiated the
counterintelligence operation targeting the Trump campaign, called
Operation Crossfire Hurricane. His report itself said, “We did not find
documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper
motivation influenced his decision [to open an investigation surveilling
the Trump campaign].”
One
might reasonably ask: When top FBI lawyer and principal in Operation
Crossfire Hurricane, Lisa Page, says in an August 2016 text to fellow
Crossfire Hurricane principal, FBI official Peter Strzok, that Trump is
“not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” And Strzok responds
“No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it,” isn’t that perhaps documentary
evidence of a political bias?
Perhaps
Mr. Horowitz was looking for an FBI “To Do List” entitled “Steps We
Will Take to Undermine the Presidential Candidacy of Donald J. Trump”
and came up blank.
Nonetheless, the Deep State Media, like NBC News,
dutifully and breathlessly declared in its headline on the story:
“Internal Justice watchdog finds that Russia probe was justified, not
biased against Trump.”
A
representative republic is severely impaired, indeed threatened, when
its constitutionally protected watchdogs in the Fourth Estate abandon
their most basic critical faculties in favor of advancing the agenda of
their preferred political party. Eventually, the absurdities they foist
upon a skeptical populace lead inevitably to their deserved reputation
as discredited Deep State handmaidens, not to be believed.
William
F. Marshall has been an intelligence analyst and investigator in the
government, private, and non-profit sectors for more than 30 years. He
is a senior investigator for Judicial Watch, Inc., and a contributor to Townhall, American Thinker, and The Federalist. (The views expressed are the author’s alone, and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.)
We know Biden has roaming hands, but how far have they roamed?
Before you even begin to read this post, remember what Hillary Clinton, the voice of the left in 2015, said about sexual assault allegations:
"Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and
supported." With that fixed in your mind, it's time to talk about Joe
Biden.
The
#MeToo movement in America reached the top of its crescendo in
2017. The diminuendo phase happened soon after, when it seemed as if
every Democrat man in America, especially in Hollywood and the media,
had been playing fast and loose with women, even while pandering to
feminists.
Up
until spring 2019, when he began his presidential run, Joe Biden seemed
immune. That was when Lucy Flores, a Bernie Sanders–supporter, claimed
that, in 2014, when he was still vice president, Joe Biden touched her
inappropriately and kissed her head at a campaign rally. In other
words, she claimed that he did to her what he did to the women and girls
in this video:
Biden
denied the accusation. And because Biden seemed like the best hope to
beat President Trump, he got a pass. (Recall that back in 1998,
feminist reporter Nina Burleigh said of Clinton, "I would be happy to
give him a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion
legal." Politics before principles...)
Tara
Reade, however, believed Flores's claims. To support Flores, she went
public with her own story about the time that Biden had "put his hand on
my shoulder and run his finger up my neck." However, because Reade was
threatening the man who would save America from Trump, the Democrats
threw at her the worst insult they could think of, calling her a Putin puppet. Reade retreated.
As
the Democrat Party began to consolidate around Biden, Reade decided
that, for her daughter's sake, it was time to tell the whole story about
Joe. She reached out to Time's Up, a post-#MeToo organization that was
established to help survivors of sexual assault and harassment tell
their stories. Because Reade supported Sanders, Time's Up bowed out of
helping her. The organization was afraid that doing supporting her
would look like a political act and threaten its non-profit
standing. Additionally, Reade had written nice things about Putin,
which gave credence to the charge that she was a Russian operative.
Eventually,
Reade found her way to Katie Halper, a podcaster and journalist who
often works with Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi (one of the last honest
left-leaning journalists). On Wednesday, Katie Halper released a short excerpt of
a more extended interview with Reade. In the excerpt, Reade gives
graphic details about what Biden allegedly did to her in 1993.
According
to Reade, she was working in Joe Biden's office in 1993. Her
supervisor asked that she deliver a gym bag to Biden. Reade reached
Biden just as he was finishing a conversation with someone, after which
they were alone.
Suddenly,
Biden pushed Reade up against a wall, slithered his hand down the
outside of her skirt and up the inside, and then thrust his fingers, not
just into her underwear, but into her. At the same time, he started
kissing her and asking her if she wanted to go somewhere else.
Reade's
body language must have alerted Biden to the fact that, no, she didn't
want to go somewhere else, for Biden pulled away. He then said
either, "Come on, man. I heard you liked me" or, perhaps, "Come on,
man. I thought you liked me."
Reade
was shattered. Up until then, she'd admired Biden, whom she considered
a father figure, for he was the same age as her father. More than
that, "[h]e was, like, this champion of women's rights in my eyes, and I
couldn't believe it was happening. It seemed surreal."
Even
worse than the assault, said Reade, was what Biden did when it was
over. "He took his finger. He just, like, pointed at me and said,
'You're nothing to me.'" And at that moment, Reade truly felt like
nothing. While she told her brother and a close friend what happened
immediately after the event, she remained silent until Flores's words,
and the treatment meted out to Flores, caused her to act.
Keeping
in mind Hillary Clinton's words, which were the mantra of the Democrat
Party until too many Democrat men got hit by them, Reade must be
believed. And frankly, listening to her, she sounds believable, not
least because it's so easy to envision gropey, arrogant, hair-sniffing
Biden being gropey and arrogant with Reade — and then calling her "man,"
as he does everyone else.
Hillary Clinton speaks in Baltimore on June 5, 2017. (Patrick Semansky/AP Photo)
Hillary Clinton on Women Uncomfortable With Biden Touching Them: ‘Get Over It’
September 30, 2019 Updated: September 30, 2019
Former first lady, secretary of state, and presidential contender Hillary Clinton dismissed
women and girls who have expressed how uncomfortable they became when
touched by former vice president and current presidential hopeful Joe Biden.
Clinton, 71, was with her daughter Chelsea Clinton, 39, promoting the new book they wrote together.
“For goodness’ sake, I’m sorry, I have to jump in because I’ve heard a little bit about that,” Clinton told People magazine. “I
mean, I don’t think that the Twitterverse is the American electorate,
but there are lots of vocal voices that say all kinds of things.”
She said Biden, 76, “is a thoroughly decent human being who has served our country honorably and well for decades.”
“You
could take any person who sticks their little head above the parapet
and says, ‘I’m going to run for president,’ and find something that … a
little annoying habit or other kind of behavior that people are going to
pick apart and disagree with,” she continued.
Today's News Updates
Biden
for years has come under scrutiny for his physical contact that
includes repeatedly touching women and girls he comes into contact with,
although some women, like Stephanie Carter, have defended him.
Support our independent journalism and donate a 'Coffee' now.
Ashton
Carter (R) makes remarks after he was sworn in as Secretary of Defense
as his wife Stephanie (2nd L) Vice President Joe Biden (L) listen in the
Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington on Feb. 17, 2015.
(Alex Wong/Getty Images)
On the other side, former Nevada lieutenant governor candidate Lucy Flores wrote an essay in March describing a 2014 interaction with Biden, who attended a political event to endorse Flores.
She said Biden came up behind her and put his hands on her shoulders before leaning in and inhaling her hair.
“I
was mortified,” she wrote. “I thought to myself … ‘What in the actual
[expletive]? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my
hair?'”
She
was embarrassed and shocked, she wrote, and even more so when he kissed
the back of her head, leaving her temporarily paralyzed.
“He
made me feel uneasy, gross, and confused. The vice-president of the
United States of America had just touched me in an intimate way reserved
for close friends, family, or romantic partners—and I felt powerless to
do anything about it,” Flores wrote.
Biden released a statement saying he’d never acted inappropriately.
Joe Biden
✔@JoeBiden
Social
norms are changing. I understand that, and I’ve heard what these women
are saying. Politics to me has always been about making connections, but
I will be more mindful about respecting personal space in the future.
That’s my responsibility and I will meet it.
163K
54.1K people are talking about this
“In
my many years on the campaign trail and in public life, I have offered
countless handshakes, hugs, expressions of affection, support and
comfort,” Biden said. “And not once—never—did I believe I acted
inappropriately. If it is suggested I did so, I will listen
respectfully. But it was never my intention. I may not recall these
moments the same way, and I may be surprised at what I hear.”
Biden said in a Twitter video he would change his behavior, citing changing social norms, but soon after touched a 10-year-old while at a campaign event.
Soon after, several other women, including 43-year-old Amy Lappos, said Biden touched them inappropriately.
Lappos said Biden grabbed her during a 2009 fundraiser.
“It wasn’t sexual, but he did grab me by the head,” Lappos said.
“He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me.
When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the
mouth.”
In
a Facebook post, she blasted people who think the “grossness of men
invading women’s boundaries to sniff and touch is debatable.”
Ghislaine Maxwell’s secrets, if revealed,
will be incendiary
Jeffrey
Epstein went to (or was sent to) the grave keeping his secrets.
However, Ghislaine Maxwell almost certainly shares the same secrets. The
latest allegation is that she has or had videos of two “high profile”
American politicians, as well as two other influential people, having
sex with underage girls. If that’s true, it’s reasonable to believe that
she has more than just those videos. A lot of famous people may soon be
in trouble, although probably not Trump, who wised up a long time ago
about Epstein.
The Sun writes
that William Steel, the pseudonym for a former jewel thief, claims that
Ghislaine Maxwell, whether as insurance and because she’s a very kinky
person, videotaped two highly placed American politicians, as well as
other powerful people, having sex with underage girls.
According
to Steel, who was not paid for the interview, Ghislaine liked to show
off videos of famous people engaging in illegal and immoral behavior. To
that end, she tried to impress Steel with footage of “two high-profile
politicians” engaging in sex with underage girls, as well as “two high
society figures” in a threesome with another young girl.
Although
Steel called Ghislaine a nymphomaniac, he says she wasn’t showing the
videos to impress him with her sexuality. Instead, power was the
ultimate turn-on:
He says: “I was forced to watch their videos because they were trying to impress me.
“They wanted to convince me of their power and who they held in their grip.
“They boasted about ‘owning’ powerful people.
Steel
claims that he has a fair amount of information about the disgusting,
debauched duo and that he’s willing to testify in court. While
acknowledging his past felonies, Steel assured The Sun that he never had sex with the underage girls, limiting himself to encounters with Maxwell and threesomes with adult women.
Just
as was the case with Steel, not everyone who associated with Epstein
and Maxwell was interested in sex with underage girls. Before Epstein’s
conviction, he and Maxwell were just two more rich, connected people in
the Hollywood and New York social scene. After Epstein’s conviction,
smart people dropped them, while thrill-seekers enjoyed the edgy feeling
of socializing with a depraved felon.
Trump, for example, knew Maxwell through her famous father, Robert, but eventually wanted nothing to do with Epstein:
Jeffrey Epstein turned Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago into another of his hunting grounds for young girls, leading Trump to bar him from the Florida resort, court papers claim.
“Trump
allegedly banned Epstein from his Maralago Club in West Palm Beach
because Epstein sexually assaulted a girl at the club,” according to the
papers, filed in the Sunshine State as part of an ongoing legal battle
between Epstein and Bradley Edwards, who represented many of Epstein’s
underage accusers in civil suits against him.
The filing is dated April 2011, well before Trump ascended to the presidency.
[snip]
“I
knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,” Trump told reporters
at the White House of Epstein during an appearance with Qatari Emir
Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. “I had a falling out a long time ago, I’d say
maybe 15 years.
“I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.”
Indeed, according to Bradley Edwards,
who represented many of Epstein’s victims, Trump was one of the few
people in those monied circles who helped him build a case against
Epstein.
The Clintons were not so wise. Bill Clinton famously flew repeatedly on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” airline. According to Politico, Bill’s daughter, Chelsea, was especially close with Maxwell:
Maxwell
first grew close with the Clintons after Bill Clinton left office,
vacationing on a yacht with Chelsea Clinton in 2009, attending her
wedding in 2010, and participating in the Clinton Global Initiative as
recently as 2013, years after her name first emerged in accounts of
Epstein’s alleged sexual abuse.
“Ghislaine
was the contact between Epstein and Clinton,” a person familiar with
the relationship said. “She ended up being close to the family because
she and Chelsea ended up becoming close.” Lawyers for Maxwell did not
respond to requests for comment, and a spokesperson for Clinton disputed
the idea that the two women were ever close.
That
friendship, if real, doesn’t mean Chelsea ever engaged in immoral or
illegal conduct. It does suggest, though, that she didn’t choose her
friends very wisely, especially because she continued her close
friendship with Maxwell after Epstein’s initial conviction on sex
offense charges.
Chelsea
and her husband later claimed to be ignorant of Maxwell’s Epstein
connection, which may be true. Still, it’s hard to believe that two
people as connected as Chelsea and Marc Mezvinsky didn’t know anyone who
could have set them straight.
If
Maxwell survives her pre-trial imprisonment, any trial in her case will
get very interesting very fast. If I were a betting woman, though, I
do not think I would bet on the prison system doing any better a job
keeping her safe than it did keeping Epstein safe.
YOU DON'T GET ANY MORE ETHICALLY DEPRAVED THAN KAMALA HARRIS! THIS IS THE LAWYER WHO AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SAN FRANCISCO DECLINED TO PROSECUTE CATHOLIC PEDOPHILE PRIEST BECAUSE THEIR DIOSESE LOADED HER UP WITH A $50K BRIBE. IT WAS HARDLY THE ONLY ONE THESE PATHETIC SOCIOPATH SUCKED OFF!
Vice President Harris, Bill Clinton to discuss empowering women
By Eric Utter
Vice President Co-President
Kamala Harris is slated to sit down with former commander-in-briefs
Bill Clinton for a "one-on-one conversation" at a Clinton Foundation
event this week. What will the half-black, half-Indian Harris be
discussing with the First Black President, you ask? Why, how best to go about "empowering women and girls," of course.
Christopher
Cadelago, a reporter for Politico, recently broke the preposterous news
on Twitter. Cadelago noted that a press release touting the remarkable
event, held in conjunction with the Clinton Global Initiative
University, has on its Friday afternoon schedule "[a] one-on-one conversation
with President Clinton and Vice President Kamala Harris on the impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic on women, and empowering women and girls in the
U.S. and around the world." There are quite a few women who have had
one-on-one "meetings" with Clinton over the years, though I doubt most
of them would call the encounters "empowering." Harris might beg to differ.
The
preposterous has been made routine in recent years. It is now
difficult to discern actual news from satire. Legacy media outlets have
become nothing more than fake news sites, while The Babylon Bee's posts
seem all too real.
We see nations such as Eritrea and Iran sitting on the U.N.'s Human Rights Council and its Commission on the Status of Women. Will
the Biden administration soon engage in talks with North Korea and
Venezuela on best practices for food production and hunger avoidance?
It
is an increasingly bizarre world in which we live. State that there
were anomalies and inconsistencies in the 2020 American presidential
election? You will almost certainly get tossed off social media. State
that the perpetrator of the heinous Boulder, Colorado mass shooting was
a "white Christian terrorist"— despite the fact that he is a Syrian Muslim who shot and killed ten white people? No problem, doesn't violate Twitter's "misinformation" policy! Just because the statement is a flat lie — on all counts — that doesn't render it "misinformation." Remember,
only facts that contradict leftist's agenda can be deemed
"misinformation." Only notions that question their narrative can be
rightly called "conspiracy theories."
The
vital question should not be how we empower women or girls, men or
boys, Blacks or whites, gays or straights. The vital question should be
how we empower the United States and all of her citizens going
forward. At this point, the answer should be obvious.
Trump 2024.
VP Harris to Hold an Event on Women and Girls With...Bill Clinton
|
|
Posted: Mar 24, 2021 12:30 PM
Source: (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Vice
President Kamala Harris is set to hold an event with former President
Bill Clinton for the Clinton Global Initiative on the impact of Wuhan
coronavirus on women and girls.
Kamala
Harris will go one-on-one with Bill Clinton on Friday to talk about the
impact of COVID-19 on women, and empowering women and girls in the U.S.
and around the world as part of a Clinton Global Initiative event.
— Christopher Cadelago (@ccadelago) March 23, 2021
Former
President Clinton has deep ties to pedophile and convicted sex offender
Jeffery Epstein, who "killed himself" after being arrested and charged
with a series of new crimes in 2019. Clinton has also been accused of
rape and serious sexual misconduct.
Here's
Chauntae Davies, who has accused Epstein of raping her multiple times,
massaging Bill Clinton after a flight on Epstein's Lolita Express. https://t.co/L5MHvZTbUL pic.twitter.com/hrwTWsu2Jb
— Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) March 23, 2021
I
thought this was a joke. They’re really having BILL CLINTON do a talk
with Kamala Harris about the well-being and empowerment of women +
girls. Did anyone ask Paula Jones (he settled her sexual harassment suit
for nearly $1M), Juanita Broaddrick or Kathleen Willey for comment? https://t.co/w2UxUsefe6
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) March 24, 2021
I wonder if @HowardU would like to include me in their empowering women event with Bill Clinton to discuss this? pic.twitter.com/uMZTCNsGOh
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) March 24, 2021
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by New York Post (@nypost)
In fact, Epstein had a painting of Clinton wearing Monica Lewinsky's famous blue dress displayed in his New York City residence.
Jeffrey
Epstein had an oil painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress — lounging
on a chair in the Oval Office — hanging up in his Manhattan townhouse,
according to law enforcement sources.
“It
was hanging up there prominently — as soon as you walked in — in a room
to the right,” a source told The Post. “Everybody who saw it laughed
and smirked.”
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the
expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do
it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are
amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and
money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy
BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER*
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why
is no one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary
Viciously went after. The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly
stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women on record telling their stories of
him sexually assaulting them starting back in college! Imagine all the
women who still have never told their stories about him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
Becerra Hires Former Hillary Clinton Aide
Who Ignored Warnings About Harvey
Weinstein
Lena Dunham says she warned Clinton campaign in 2016 to stop associating with 'rapist' producer
·
·
Andrew Stiles - MARCH 22, 2021 3:45 PM
Xavier Becerra, the controversial secretary
of health and human services, has hired longtime Democratic strategist
Kristina Schake to lead the agency's "public education efforts" on
COVID-19.
Schake is perhaps best known for encouraging Michelle Obama to make an "undercover" shopping trip to a Target in Alexandria, Va., where an Associated Press photographer just happened to be waiting with a camera. She is credited with helping the former first lady establish her brand as an "accessible everywoman."
Schake's efforts to do the same for Hillary Clinton in 2016 were not as successful, for obvious reasons.
In her role as deputy communications director, Schake was tasked with
showcasing the failed candidate's "self-effacing, warm and funny side,"
according to the New York Times.
The
communications guru understandably struggled to capture this side of
Clinton during the campaign. More often, Schake was forced to defend the
candidate's failure to comply with federal law or the campaign's refusal to release transcripts of the paid speeches Clinton gave to Wall Street financial firms.
Efforts to portray Clinton as likable and down-to-earth were also complicated by events like the celebrity-packed fundraising concert in
Manhattan that took place less than a month before Election Day. Harvey
Weinstein, the disgraced Hollywood executive and convicted rapist,
helped produce the event.
Schake
and other members of the Clinton campaign were reportedly urged to stop
associating with Weinstein in light of the producer's longstanding
reputation as a sexual predator. Celebrity activist Lena Dunham, for
example, said she warned Schake
in 2016 that it was "a really bad idea for [Weinstein] to host
fundraisers and be involved [with the campaign] because it's an open
secret in Hollywood that he has a problem with sexual assault."
Dunham
said Schake had been surprised by the warning and promised to raise the
issue with Clinton's campaign manager, Robby Mook. Regardless of
whether the concerns about Weinstein were discussed among senior members
of the campaign, no actions appear to have been taken in response.
Clinton
spokesman Nick Merrill did not deny Dunham's claim about warning Schake
and other campaign officials but questioned why the actress "would tell
them instead of those who could stop [Weinstein]."
Days
after losing the election, Bill and Hillary Clinton had dinner with
Weinstein in part to discuss a documentary TV show about her campaign.
Hillary has repeatedly insisted she had no idea that Weinstein was a
notorious pervert.
"How could we have known?" Clinton asked the Hollywood Reporter in
2020 when asked about her relationship with the disgraced producer. "He
raised money for me, for the Obamas, for Democrats in general. And that
at the time was something that everybody thought made sense."
According
to journalist Ronan Farrow, who wrote one of the first stories
documenting the allegations against Weinstein, the sex pest tried to use
his relationship with the Clintons to thwart his reporting. Farrow said his efforts to secure an interview with Hillary Clinton in 2017 prompted a call from Merrill, who expressed concern about the "big story" Farrow was working on about Weinstein's predatory history.
Clinton's team "tried to cancel the interview … over the Weinstein stuff," Farrow said.
Clinton Body Man: Bill Visited Pedophile Island, Had Affairs During Obama Admin
Wed Dec 2, 2020
Doug
Band was Bill Clinton's body man, but that doesn't fully describe it.
For a while, Band essentially ran Clinton's life. He's also created with
the Clinton Global Initiative which turned into the infamous Clinton
Foundation.
Except that Jeffrey Epstein also claimed credit for it.
Band built Clinton Inc. into a huge international enterprise. And then got forced out by
Chelsea Clinton. (Chelsea is probably the heroine in this story.)
Epstein had Band's name in his little black book and Band had flown on
the Lolita Express. But now Band has some unhappy tales to tell about the Clintons.
Most
of these tales have to do with how much Band gave up for the Clintons
and how Chelsea cut him out. Frankly, who cares. But it's the Epstein
stuff that is getting people's attention.
Clinton
made more than two dozen trips on Epstein’s jet around this time,
Epstein’s flight logs show. In January 2003, according to Band, Clinton
visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little St. James. Band said
it was one of the few trips he declined to go on in his time with
Clinton. A Clinton spokesperson said the president had never been to the
island and provided detailed travelogue entries of the period in
question that did not contain a visit.
Except that the Clintons have been lying about Bill's travels on the Lolita Express for a long time.
Former
President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered
sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs
showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita
Express” — even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at
least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.
Clinton’s
presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been
reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and
trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world
with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their
initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned
its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a
bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.
Band,
who seems to have plenty of ties to Epstein is now trying to associate
Chelsea with Ghislaine Maxwell, which at this late date can't help be
anything but spite, but he does have a few grenades to throw.
Band
told Clinton that he believed he was allowing Chelsea to destroy Band’s
reputation because, deep down, Clinton was guilty for the pain his
infidelities had caused the family. Then Band said the unsayable: If
Clinton wanted to have girlfriends, he should divorce Hillary and move
on with his life. “It’s the honorable and right thing to do,” Band
recalled saying. Clinton listened in cold silence, biting his lower
lip.
That's in 2011.
Gabriel
Sherman doesn't seem to keen on nailing down the details of just what
Band is saying here, but it sounds like Bill Clinton was still cheating
on Hillary during the Obama administration and previously when Hillary
Clinton was in the Senate.
Consider
the timeline here. The 2012 election is coming up. Once Obama secures a
second term, Hillary moves to begin her campaign planning for 2016.
Having this leak would have been bad for Hillary's political plans.
Sherman doesn't follow up on the obvious question here. But this is the media. And even though the Clintons are toast, and even though this whole piece is damaging to the Clintons, he never actually clarifies what Bard is alleging.
Clinton gang insider spills sleazy secrets, savages Chelsea
It
begins. With no prospect of Bill or Hillary Clinton resuming high
office, one former key insider of the Clinton Machine is spilling his
guts and telling very unflattering stories about the family business.
Doug Band, who began as a White House intern, moved on the become “body
man” and then key aide, went on to mastermind the post-presidency
enrichment of the Clintons and (not incidentally) himself. But
around 5 years ago, there was a great falling-out, predictably mostly
about money, and now he has unburdened himself from various sleazy
secrets of the Clinton empire with a series of interviews that has
resulted in long article in Vanity Fair authored by Gabriel Sherman.
I urge you to read the whole thing if you are interested in finally hearing some of the dirt that was such a huge part of the family of grifters that moved from Arkansas to the nation’s capital. But if you are in a hurry, The UK Daily Mail and the New York Post select
pieces of gossip to focus on, with Brit paper highlighting Bill’s
sabotage of Hillary’s 2008 presidential campaign and Chelsea’s suck-up
to Ghislaine Maxwell to obtain access to yachts and cool homes, while
the NYP focuses on Band’s rivalry with Chelsea and his disparagement of
her abilities and her trading in her name.
Nobody
comes out looking good here, which is exactly what one would expect
from this bunch of crooks and schemers. Copyright concerns prevent me
from excerpting as many sections as I would like. I will focus on
Chelsea because if there is to be a future to a Clinton political
dynasty, Chelsea will be the standard-bearer.
Band’s
allies say he is the victim of a whisper campaign by Clintonworld
rivals—Chelsea Clinton most of all—who were jealous of his favorite-son
status and business success, which, they point out, has continued after
he cut ties with the Clintons. “Doug’s made a lot of money. Was the
Clinton connection helpful? One hundred percent. But it discounts how
smart Doug is,” a Clinton donor said. The source was one of many
Clintonworld insiders who would only speak on background. “The split is
real and it is deep. There’s nothing in it for me to get in the middle
of it,” a longtime Clinton adviser said, offering an explanation I heard
echoed in my reporting. (snip)
In
the spring of 2011, Chelsea Clinton, then 31, became vice chairman of
what would be the renamed Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. After
a peripatetic career that included stints at McKinsey, a hedge fund,
and NBC News, it was as if she had finally claimed her birthright as
heir to the family dynasty. (snip)
Clintonworld
sources told me that Chelsea grew to resent Band. “Chelsea hated Doug
because he was like a son to her father,” a Clinton friend said. Band
took offense that Chelsea treated him at times like hired help. It was a
combustible mix that was about to explode into personal grievance. “As a
board member, Chelsea had a responsibility to ask questions about
Foundation activities she didn’t understand or had reservation about.
For some reason, Doug seemed to resent that,” a Clinton spokesperson
said.
Around
the time Band launched Teneo in June 2011, Chelsea summoned Band and
his cofounder Declan Kelly to the Clinton office in Harlem. Band walked
in to find Bill flanked by Chelsea and her husband, financier Marc
Mezvinsky. According to Band, Chelsea said Band’s $2.5 million offer to
put her dad on Teneo’s advisory board wasn’t enough. She wanted Band to
give her and Mezvinsky an ownership position in Teneo. To Band, it felt
like a shakedown. “I thought she was kidding or deeply sick,” he told
me. Band looked across the table at Bill, but he sided with Chelsea.
Band refused to give up an equity stake. The meeting ended badly. A
Clinton family spokesperson denies that Chelsea asked for equity. (snip)
Chelsea
heard from foundation officials that Band was “hustling” donors to
become Teneo clients behind Bill’s back. Band heard that she accused
Band of planting a Page Six item about troubles in her marriage, which
he denied. Band, meanwhile, told foundation staff that Chelsea was
vastly underqualified to be in charge. He found it especially galling
that Chelsea accused him of cashing in on his Clinton connections when,
in his view, Chelsea benefited far more from her famous last name. He
told people she got paid $1.2 million by NBC, not $600,000 as was
reported. She had a driver, security, a $10 million apartment, a wedding
that cost $5 million, and traveled on private planes. “Every job she
received was based on her name,” Band said, still vexed. “Mine was based
on my reputation, experience, and what I had done.” (A Clinton
spokesperson denied Chelsea was paid $1.2 million by NBC.) (snip)
Chelsea
had ties to Epstein and Maxwell, Band said; he showed me a photo of
Bill and Chelsea posing with Epstein and Maxwell at the King of
Morocco’s wedding. Chelsea remained friends with Maxwell for years after
the press revealed Maxwell was a close associate of Epstein’s. For
instance, Chelsea invited Maxwell to her 2010 wedding at the Brooke
Astor estate in Rhinebeck, New York, after Epstein had pleaded guilty in
Florida to procuring sex from a minor.
“Ghislaine had access to yachts and nice homes. Chelsea needed that,” Band told me.
A
Clinton family spokesperson said Chelsea was on friendly terms with
Maxwell because of a mutual friend (Gateway computer founder Ted Waitt)
and only took one yacht trip with Maxwell in 2009: “It wasn’t until 2015
that Chelsea became aware of the horrific allegations against Ghislaine
Maxwell and she hopes that all the victims find justice. Chelsea was
friendly with her because of Maxwell’s relationship with a dear friend.
When that relationship ended, Chelsea’s relationship with her ended as
well.”
In
late October 2011, Band instructed Bill Clinton’s office to bar Maxwell
from all Clintonworld events as a way of driving a wedge between
Maxwell and Chelsea. “I knew in telling everyone to stop including
Ghislaine that Chelsea and her father would be very angry. It made it
harder for them to justify being close to her,” Band said.
But keep in mind that omerta still
governs many of the more central schemers in the Clinton machine,
because they made peace with the Obama Machine, and now have or aspire
to insider roles in what they assume will be a Biden presidency. People
like John Podesta and Rahm Emanuel. I suspect most of them will go to
their graves before they tell the truth.
Photo credit: Zero Emission Resource Organisation CC BY 2.0 license
THE GRIFTERS:
HILLARY CLINTON AND HER SERIAL RAPIST HUSBAND
“The
couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service” into
admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes
in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a
political
machine
that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially
of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for
the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
The
basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall
Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and
donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
"But what the Clintons do is criminal
because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel
thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use
it to enrich themselves and their friends.
They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power
and money. That should be clear to every
person on the planet by now."
Patricia McCarthy
THE FINAL DAYS OF HILLARY CLINTON: MISTRESS of the SWAMP, GLOBAL BRIBES SUCKER and LOOTER OF THE POOR
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/05/hillary-clintons-last-days.html
“If the Constitution did not forbid cruel and unusual punishment, the sentence I would like to see imposed would place both Bill and Hillary Clinton in the same 8-by-12 cell.” ROBERT ARVAY – AMERICAN THINKER com
DICK MORRIS:
On America’s First Family of Crime….. NO! Not the Bushes again!
Clinton global hucksterism – Selling out America like they sold out the Lincoln Bedroom.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/06/-morris-how-bill-clinton-duped.html
THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium production in the U.S.
Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits
of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had
Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even
more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access,
favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY