CLOSET MUSLIM, SERVANT TO MUSLIM DICTATORS Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s back door, however, was unique to him. Before prosecutors send some of the dimmer Hollywood stars to the slammer for their dimness, they might want to ask just how much influence a Saudi billionaire peddled to get Obama into Harvard. JACK CASHILL
Friday, October 20, 2023
BARACK OBAMA AND THE MUSLIMS - Ex-Obama NLRB Counsel, 80 Professors Sign Petition Saying Hamas Atrocities are a Legit “Military Operation” The mask is coming off.
Mahmoud al-Zahar is the chief political guide
of Hamas. He doesn’t mince words about the goal of terror group. It’s
not just to destroy Israel and to replace it with a Palestinian state
“from the river to the sea.” It’s not just about killing every last Jew
on the planet. No, the fanatical True Believers of Hamas aim at nothing
less than creating a world where Islam dominates everywhere, and
everywhere, Muslims rule. Daniel Greenfield discussed this here,
and here is more about what al-Zahar said less than a year ago: “WATCH:
Israel is only the first target, warns Hamas commander,” by Danielle
Greyman-Kennard, Jerusalem Post, October 9, 2023:
Footage of senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar calling for world domination has resurfaced online.
“We believe in what our Prophet Muhammad said: “Allah drew the ends
of the world near one another for my sake, and I have seen its eastern
and western ends. The dominion of my nation would reach those ends that
have been drawn near me,” Zahar said in the video that was published on
MEMRI TV in December of 2022.
“The entire 510 million square kilometers of Planet Earth will come
under [a system] where there is no injustice, no oppression, no Zionism,
no treacherous Christianity and no killings and crimes like those being
committed against the Palestinians, and against the Arabs in all the
Arab countries, in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and other countries,” he said.
What does that mean? In this brave new world ruled by and for
Muslims, there will be no place for Israel, but no place, either, for
America, or France, or the U.K., or Italy, or Germany, or India, or
Brazil. The entire planet will fall under the reign of Islam. One vast
Dar al-Islam will cover the globe, and apparently there will not even be
room for the most cringing of dhimmis to exist, making Al-Zahar’s
hallucinatory goal far worse for non-Muslims than what they have
heretofore endured under Muslim rule. They will no longer have the
possibility of surviving as dhimmis, no matter how wretched; their only
alternatives will be immediate conversion or death. In the glorious
Islamic future that Al-Zahar is certain will come, there will be no
place for other religions. There will be “no Zionism [i.e. Judaism]” and
“no treacherous Christianity.”
To repeat: Mahmoud Al-Zahar, one of the co-founders of Hamas in 1987,
and the most senior Hamas official still living in Gaza, has a goal
that should alarm all non-Muslims. That goal, to repeat, is this:
“The entire 510 million square kilometers of Planet Earth
will come under [a system] where there is no injustice, no oppression,
no Zionism, no treacherous Christianity.”
When Israeli troops finally enter Gaza to wipe out Hamas, they will
be wiping out people who have fun as they decapitate babies and
children, burn families alive in their houses, rape and murder young
girls whose bodies they gleefully display on the back of trucks, posting
photographs of an elderly lady’s corpse on Facebook so her relatives
can see. The mutilations of bodies — the pulling out of entrails, the
eyes gouged out, the genitals cut of and pushed into the mouths of the
dead — these things Hamas has done, but the Israellis who saw the
evidence haven’t been able to bring themselves to discuss publicly. This
is Hamas, intent on removing from the earth all Jews and Christians,
leaving the entire world to those whom Oriana Fallaci contemptuously
described as the “sons of Allah.”
The next time a Hamas spokesman, his voice breaking with feigned
despair at those terrible Israelis who for no reason at all are dropping
bombs in Gaza, explains on radio or television that Hamas only wants to
“free our people from the open-air prison we have been living in for
more than 50 years,” be ready to remind him, and the too-gullible
members of his audience, what Hamas’ co-founder set out just last
December as the terror group’s objectives. That should provide a
salutary shock for those who until now have been unaware of what Hamas
intends to do, and what jihad means, and why, alas, that worldwide jihad
will never end.
Ex-Obama NLRB Counsel, 80 Professors Sign Petition Saying Hamas Atrocities are a Legit “Military Operation”
The City University of New York has been transformed from a public
university that let poor kids get a good education and succeed. They
boast about how many Nobel laureates they’ve produced, but those days
are behind them. Instead, CUNY has become an antisemitic terrorist
hellhole where over 80 faculty members
are willing to sign on to a statement saying that the murder of elderly
women and children, the rape of women and the kidnapping of children is
a “military operation”.
The petition begins with…
“We, the undersigned CUNY staff and faculty, strongly
object to Chancellor Félix Matos Rodríguez’s efforts to censure
expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian people. In advance of
anti-apartheid rallies planned on multiple campuses, the Chancellor
claimed that the organizers would ‘glorify Saturday’s [Oct. 7] violence
and celebrate the killings, injuries and capture of innocent people.’
This baseless, prejudicial statement reproduces the racist, Islamophobic
rhetoric that has accompanied the drumbeat for war.”
And then the petition proves that the chancellor was right as it argues that…
“there is also no equivalence between the October 7
military operation by Hamas and the subsequent military attack by the
Israeli state, and certainly no equivalence to the systemic and the
violence of Israeli settler colonialism.”
A military operation aimed at massacring and kidnapping civilians.
Signatories to this pro-rape and pro-kidnapping children petition include Marc Lamont Hill, who had already previously exposed his support for kidnapping and killing Jewish teens.
Other signatories include Jonathan Buchsbaum, a media studies
professor and author of “Cinema and the Sandinistas: Filmmaking in
Revolutionary Nicaragua” (I believe he was the protagonist of a Charlie
Kaufman novel), Anna Stetsenko, a “developmental psychologist” from
Russia, and Ellen Dichner, the Chief Counsel to the Chairman of the
National Labor Relations Board under the Obama administration.
Meanwhile, Northwestern University’s Asian American Studies Programs issued an open letter
condemning the “visible Islamophobia expressed in pro-Israel posters on
NU’s campus falsely claiming that ‘Hamas is ISIS'” and described Hamas
as a “political group”.
These are just a few examples of the mask coming off academia and the ugly vileness being revealed.
The enemies of civilization are showing themselves for who they are.
The crimes they’re defending are indefensible, but from the gulags to
Pol Pot to the suicide bombs, they were always indefensible.
Daniel
Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom
Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the
radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Pentagon CFO’s Chief of Staff Has Family Ties to Islamic Terrorism
In 2019, Yousra Fazili addressed a congressional hearing to complain
about the arrest of her cousin by Indian authorities. The woman who now
serves as Chief of Staff for the Pentagon Comptroller claimed that her
cousin was the innocent victim of oppressive Indian authorities.
According to the daughter of Kashmiri Muslim immigrants, her cousin
Mubeen Shah had been arrested under India’s Public Safety Act even
though he was “not a politician or a dissident, he isn’t a freedom
fighter, or even a kid in the street throwing stones. He’s just a
businessman. His life’s work has focused on bringing economic
opportunity to Kashmir.”
In reality, as the Hindu Post noted, Shah had “lionized
Kashmiri jihadists, agreed with a description of convicted terrorists
as ‘inspirations for the youth,’ and promised that ‘we all are ready to
spill our blood’” to keep the region Muslim. On Facebook, Shah appeared
to have posted a picture describing Mohammad Afzal Guru, an Islamic
terrorist tied to the ‘The Army of Muhammad’, which is affiliated with
Al Qaeda, as the “Pride of Kashmir”. Guru had been executed for his role
in a December 2001 attack on the Indian parliament.
Fortunately for Shah, he had his Fazili family deeply embedded in
America’s political establishment. Yousra’s sister, Sameera Fazili had
been brought in as a senior policy advisor to Obama’s National Economic
Council. And when Biden took office, she became the deputy assistant to
the president and the deputy director of the National Economic Council.
When Shah was arrested, Sameera and Yousra Fazili “dialed friends in the State Department” and the State Department demanded
information about him from the Indian government. Rep. Pramila Jayapal,
a radical leftist sympathetic to Islamic terrorists, agitated for his
release.
Soon Shah was out and Yousra Fazili was in, joining her sister in a
high-level position in the Biden administration. Where Sameera had
worked on the economic side of things, Yousra became the Special
Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical
and Biological Defense Programs three years after agitating on behalf of
a terrorist supporter.
It was incredible even by the standards of an administration that
seemed to have abandoned even the most elementary forms of background
checks and security screenings.
But before long, Yousra Fazili appeared to be providing materials on
Islam to federal contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton and then to the
Defense Intelligence Agency. She made the leap to the Department of
Defense, first serving as the Special Assistant to the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Defense
Programs and now serves as the Chief of Staff to the Comptroller and
Chief Financial Officer of the Pentagon.
But before that she was working for the state sponsor of Hamas.
Rep. Jack Bergman, a retired Marine Corps lieutenant general, wrote a letter
to Secretary of Defense Austin, expressing his concern “about the
security clearances and responsibilities entrusted to Yousra Fazili, the
Chief of Staff for the Comptroller and Chief Financial Officer of the
Pentagon” due to her past work as “‘strategic’ advisor to Meshal
Al-Thani, the Qatari Ambassador to the U.S., for over three years.”
Qatar is a close ally of Iran, hosts Hamas leaders and has ties to
Islamic terrorist groups all over the world. Reports link the Qatari royal family to Al Qaeda.
The Islamic terror state harbored 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed who escaped when Qatari officials allegedly tipped him off and
he left on a “a specially equipped government executive jet, complete
with blacked-out windows.”
Furthermore, as Rep. Bergman points out, Qatar was engaged in covert
hostilities against the United States. Fazili worked for the “Qatari
Ambassador at the time that her client was targeting prominent Americans
in an effort to silence Qatar’s critics, including the then-Chairman of
the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Ed Royce, and the former acting
head of the Central Intelligence Agency, Michael Morell.”
How does someone go from working for an ally of Iran and Hamas to a prominent position at the Pentagon in a matter of years?
The failure by the Biden administration and the Pentagon to perform
even the most elementary vetting of Yousra Fazili is a massive national
security failure. Yousra Fazili had testified on behalf of her cousin,
while lying about his support for Islamic terrorists, and had publicly
supported Islamic terrorists linked to Al Qaeda. The efforts by the
Fazili sisters to rally support for him in the State Department should
have made that public knowledge in D.C.
Yousra’s sister Sameera, despite her role in the Obama and the Biden
administrations, also had a troubling past with extremist groups.
When Biden brought her into
the National Economic Council, it was revealed that Sameera was a
member of Stand With Kashmir (SWK) “which was founded by her cousin,
Hafsa Kanjwal” and which had “praised and defended the actions of a
number of violent Islamists” including Asiya Andrabi who had “met with
Al Qaeda officials and told them that if ‘you belong to Sheikh Osama’s Al-Qaeda then you are very welcome because he was a legitimate leader of Jihad.’”
Her cousin, Hafsa Kanjwal appeared at a pro-Hamas rally and at foreign conference led by a former
Palestinian Islamic Jihad board member, and called for Muslims
operating in America to “put a check on American exceptionalism.”
Finally she’s an instructor at The People’s Forum: an organization
funded by a Chinese Communist based operation whose offices face a “red banner that reads, in Chinese, ‘Always Follow the Party’ and a “plate depicting Xi.”
How exactly does someone a few degrees of separation from Al Qaeda go
on to serve as Chief of Staff for the Pentagon Comptroller?
The exposure of Yousra Fazili comes only a few weeks after it was revealed
that Ariane Tabatabai, the Chief of Staff to the Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, had worked
with an operation set up by the Iranian government and coordinated her
congressional testimony with them. Despite published emails between Tabatabai and Iran, the Pentagon allowed her to keep her position and her security clearance.
“We have confirmed that Ms. Tabatabai’s employment and clearance
processes were carried out in accordance with all appropriate laws and
policies,” a Department of Defense official replied to Sen. Joni Ernst.
Two Muslim Pentagon Chiefs of Staff were shown to have worked with
enemy nations. And the Defense Department and the Biden administration
has chosen to keep them on the job.
When associates and employees of enemy governments that are tied to
Islamic terrorism can waltz in and take high-ranking positions in the
Department of Defense, national security no longer means anything. The
Pentagon has been infiltrated by political hires who would have been
disqualified from even being considered twenty years ago on the basis of
their associations, their views and their links to enemy governments.
Now Iran and Qatar can plant their employees and catspaws at key
positions throughout the Pentagon. And we wonder why our intelligence
and our operations are so badly compromised.
Daniel
Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom
Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the
radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Reflections on when a gigantic biographical inconvenience was successfully hidden and denied.
THE KORAN
BIBLE OF THE MUSLIM TERRORIST:
“The
Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where
young boys are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the
petrodollar-flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI
Koran 2:191 "s lay the unbelievers wherever you find them" Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends" Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam" Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran" Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels" Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them" Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them" Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood" Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies" Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".
From Munich to Gaza to America
Terrorist’s grandson, now in the U.S. Navy, touts “original glow that once graced the face of Islam.”
“I grew up in the
crosshairs of the Israeli-Palestinian war in Gaza” and “the threat of
terrorism has cast a long shadow on my life.” Even so, to impose “even
more intensive vetting on the entire Muslim world would be dangerous
and unconstitutional.” American Muslims “are proven to be peaceful
contributors to our American economy and way of life,” and “moderate
Muslims, like my friend and former colleague Rumana Ahmed, can help protect American lives and restore the original glow that once graced the face of Islam.”
Who is this who touts the “original glow”
of Islam, lived in the shadow of terrorism, and grew up the crosshairs
of the “Israeli-Palestinian war” in Gaza? It’s Ammar Campa-Najjar,
writing in a February 25, 2017 commentary in The Hill, which bills him as “a Mexican-Palestinian American and former Obama campaign and administration official.” But there’s more to the man.
Ammar is the grandson of Muhammad
Abu Yousef al-Najjar, mastermind of the Palestinian terrorists who
abducted, tortured and murdered 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich
Olympics in 1972. Maybe that’s the “shadow” of terrorism he was talking
about. Ammar is also the son of Palestinian Authority official Yasser Najjar. Ammar claims his father “migrated from the Middle East to America on a student visa,” met a Mexican-American lady named Abigail and raised a family in San Diego county, but there’s a problem here.
Back in 2003 Linda Gradstein of National Public Radio interviewedYasser al-Najjar at his office in Gaza,
where he served with the Palestinian Authority. Yasser was married,
with four children but his wife and children were not named. After the
Israelis killed Muhammad Abu Yousef al-Najjar, Yasser was a fugitive.
Son Ammar has not documented Yasser’s move to the United States, or
claims that he earned an MBA from San Diego State and started several
clothing boutiques.
“I attended an
Islamic school in San Diego as a child,” Ammar told The Hill. “The
school was part of a mosque called Masjid Abu Bakr, where hundreds of
people prayed and maintained strong relations with local elected and law
enforcement officials.I knew of three men at
that mosque, Khalid al-Mihdhar, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, who
were issued visas. . . Those three men were among the 19 terrorist
hijackers who carried out the September 11 attacks in 2001.” So maybe the relations with politicians and law enforcement were not that strong, and Ammar may have “known of” other terrorists in Gaza.
Why anybody would move there from San Diego, “America’s finest city,” is hard to fathom, but Ammar told the San Diego Union-Tribune he “lived in Gaza from ages 8 to 12.”
Born in 1989, that would put Ammar’s Gaza stretch from 1997 to 2001,
year of the 9/11 attack and “five years after President Bill Clinton got
the Israelis and Palestinians to sign a peace agreement. Sadly, that
peace didn’t last, and Gaza devolved into a war zone — the Second
Intifada.” The former Obama official wasn’t done.
“As a proud Mexican Palestinian American,
witnessing a U.S.-brokered peace collapse into a U.S.-funded war was an
early lesson on how fragile things can be. I remember the first night
of bombing, the entire city of Gaza had its electricity cut off, and I,
my mom, stepmom, dad and younger brothers hid in the dark corner of a
cold kitchen floor as Apache helicopters and F-16s leveled surrounding
buildings and carpet-bombed the town for hours.”
Note the joint presence of “mom and
stepmom.” Ammar has two mommies, and a daddy who allegedly “migrated to
the USA on a student visa” but is also a Palestinian Authority official in Gaza. His own time in Gaza, Ammartold Rolling Stone, was “a veryObamaesque,Dreams of Your Father, situation.”
Despite attendance at an Islamic school
that was part of a mosque, Ammar comes billed as a Christian. His mother
is Catholic and as a teenager, “he spent time as a teenager living with a great-uncle who is a Catholic priest,” but the priest is not named or interviewed in the story. It’s not clear when, exactly, Ammar abandoned Islam but the story stuck. It was hardly the only example of deceptive behavior.
As La Prensa San Diego revealed, the Islamic student once went by the name Ammar Yasser Najjar, and only changed it to Ammar “Campa-Najjar” when he ran for Congress in 2018. Rolling Stone billed him as a “a rockstar Democratic candidate.”
He ran as a progressive and lost to Duncan Hunter. In 2020, the son of
Yasser Najjar styled himself as a moderate conservative and lost to
Darrell Issa.
The congressional loser had never held
public office or served on any local community board, commission, or
civic group in the city of Chula Vista, near San Diego, where he ran for
mayor in 2022. Despite more than 700 mail-in ballots with either
non-matching or missing signatures, the Obama Democrat lost to Republican John McCann. In August, the former Obama White House official joined the U.S. Navy.
“Today, in front
of my family, friends, my grandmother in heaven and God, I stood aboard
the USS Midway and swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend our
nation as a commissioned United States Navy Officer,” Ammar told People Magazine, quoting Winston Churchill that as a reservist he was now “twice the citizen.”
The former Ammar Yasser Najjar claimed he first
tried to join up at age 17, but as People’s Virginia Chamlee explained,
“his mother refused to sign off on the decision, due to his father
being away at the time.” In similar style, Ammar told Robin Abcarian of
the Los Angeles Times that “he’d always wanted to serve in the military, and even tried to enlist at 17 before his mother put a stop to it.”
Neither journalist specified whether that was the mother or the step-mother Ammar previously mentioned. And no comment from Yasser Najjar, the Palestinian Authority official in Gaza who somehow migrated to the USA on a student visa.
“The military doesn’t have the luxury of
getting into these cultural disputes trying to divide us,” the officer
told Abcarian. “Where some people have seen my heritage, my background
as a liability, the Navy says those are not liabilities, they are
assets. A command of the Arab language, fluent in Spanish, having lived
in the Middle East, my cultural competency gives us a strategic
advantage. . . My Arabic is actually more fluent than my Spanish.”
Abcarian found Campa-Najjar to be
somewhat “guarded” but accepted his contention that he was done with
politics, “at least for now.” The columnist might cast a glance at his Wikipedia entry.
“Ammar Campa-Najjar is a United States naval officer,” it begins, as though he had graduated Annapolis and commanded a carrier.
His father Yasser Najjar “was an important internal critic of
Palestinian hardliners” and during his time in Gaza, “he attempted to
counteract the rising influence of Hamas.” Grandfather Muhammad Abu Yousef al-Najjar “has been the subject of significant controversy,” and so on.
On Sunday, nearly a thousand pro-Hamas demonstrators gathered in San Diego, but if the newly minted naval officer showed up, he did not speak to reporters. At this writing, his former White House colleague Rumana Ahmed has also been on the quiet side.
“In 2011, I was hired, straight out of college, to work at the White House and eventually the National Security Council,” Ahmed told the Atlantic in 2017. In that role, Ahmed became senior adviser to Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, a big-time promoter of the Iran deal. That was an easy sell to reporters, Rhodes quipped, because they “literally know nothing.”
If that seems a stretch, check out the establishment media reporting on the man formerly known as Ammar Nasser Najjar. He’sthe Palestinian Mexican-American with two mommies, who moved to Gaza. He’s the Islamic school student who became a Christian and seeks to restore “the original glow that once graced the face of Islam.”
The rockstar Democratic candidate is in the Navy now, and a Senate seat is up for grabs. As Donald Trump likes to say, we’ll have to see what happens.
Lloyd
Billingsley is the author of Yes I Con: United Fakes of America, Barack
‘Em Up: A Literary Investigation, Hollywood Party, and numerous other
works.
Sexual chaos in the Arab world drives some of its grotesque violence
During the attack on
Israel, a member of Hamas grabs a Jewish girl. He lies down on top of
her, comes to orgasm, stands up, and shoots her. What kind of sadistic
twists were already present in his head that allowed the softness of
sexual relations to be entwined with the violence of murder?
No one asks this question in America
because it means looking deeper than most people want. But it needs to
be asked since it is central to the problem of future peace or the lack
thereof. Everyone knows there are cultural differences between people.
Do some differences make it impossible to co-mingle groups? Yes, indeed!
It is particularly true in the case of Arabs and Jews.
Sexuality
between family members among the Jews is seen as destructive to family
unity. Violations are condemned roundly. Among Arabs, sexuality is part
of the family package. The most common manifestation is polygamy. Most
American women expect exclusivity in marriage. It provides financial and
social security, as well as clear lines of inheritance for their
children.
This is a complex topic since most Arab males do not
engage in polygamy. Nonetheless, it is incumbent upon Westerners to
understand that polygamy may be the force that most disrupts relations
between Arabs and Westerners, because it causes an unnatural social
condition where there is a chronic shortage of women. If one man takes
four wives, three men go without. It is an arithmetical inevitability.
In the olden days, this problem was
addressed by attacking neighboring villages to kill the men and take the
girls and women. Always the strong killing the weak. Moreover, these
extra men made up a willing army to go to war since success led to
family life, status, and a slave to keep house while the husband sat at
the coffee house with his friends. This situation is best described as
“women as objects.”
For
the man, sexual appetite was always to be fulfilled upon demand. This
made for some really unhappy women. Failure of the woman to comply or be
happy about it could easily lead to the entrance of a new and younger
wife. All children belonged to the men, so divorce would lead to women
alone on the street, bereft of their children and means of support.
Now,
we get to the hub of things. All men of every culture have always been
exempt from diaper changing. There has always been the small but not
zero possibility of his making the child into a sexual object—boy or
girl—especially if marital relations were strained. Unfortunately, this
insight is true of women as well, especially under conditions of
unhappiness.
There is also the issue of the ever-present pure
ignorance of the consequences of early sexual arousal. The infant,
toddler, or child—as an object—is not in control of the stimulation of
the one or the other parent. It is my contention that such early
stimulation creates a form of confusion of sexuality and violence on the
one hand and affection on the other.
Non-sexual affection draws
the youngest members of the family closer together with parents,
siblings, cousins, aunts, and uncles, and even the occasional strangers
who enter the house like family friends. However, if sexuality is
imposed by others (including all of the above), that makes people,
particularly children, afraid of one another. Sex is always an
imposition. Thus, the need for affection that undercuts the innate
violence of the sexual act.
The thesis here is that the dysfunctional Arab family reflects how sexuality is manifest in the early lives of the children.
I
want to be very clear: In general, good, nice, and kind people
(including Muslims) have been protected socially and sexually during
their earliest years. Later, such people can offer affection and
manifest altruism.
Children who have been abused socially and/or
sexually from infancy will show various levels of pathology as adults.
This is a simplified understanding of adult psychopathology that can
arise from multiple sources, but being used as a sexual object early in
life is a form of violence that makes later sexual expression a problem
for the individual, perhaps without an easy, or even any, solution.
Most males in the Western world could not
seek affection and closeness during sexual expression and then stand up
and kill their partners. In the United States, we lock people up who
rape and then murder.
Social structures that induce anger between
men and women become a systematic source of their individual
pathologies. Here, the social pathology is a mixing of sexuality and
violence. Thus, war and rape have always been linked.
Still, there
are differences between cultures. A nitwit whose name I’ve deliberately
forgotten wrote a master’s thesis at Hebrew University arguing that
Israeli soldiers do not rape Arab women during war because the soldiers
are racist.
No, nitwit! The confusion between anger and sex is the
pathological state. Gazan men apparently have received the lion’s share
of this confusion from their earliest childhoods, as demonstrated by
their actions in Israel. This conflation of sex and anger rolls from one
generation to the next with permission and support from cultural norms.
Islamic Jew-Hatred, Dhimmitude and the Doctrine of Sacred Space
For certain entities, the existence of Israel - and Jews - is intolerable.
In the wake of the savage HAMAS attack
against Israel on the morning of 7 October 2023, many are waking up to
its genocidal intent against Jews. Understandably, there are memories of
pogroms past, of the horrific toll of the Holocaust, and references to
“Nazis” and the “Einsatzgruppen”.
This time, though, as Israel prepares to do what must be done to wipe
out the HAMAS presence in Gaza, we need to understand exactly who and
what it is: an Islamic terror group, dedicated to the destruction of the
Jewish State of Israel and the killing of as many Jews as possible. We
might start with the HAMAS Covenant,
published in 1988, the year that HAMAS was formally established. Its
opening lines tell us exactly who HAMAS is and why it exists:
“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until
Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it” (The
Martyr, Imam Hassan alBanna, of blessed memory).
We’ll note here that this quote is from Hassan al-Banna, the 1928
founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. And here is the motto of the
Muslim Brotherhood:
‘Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the
Quran is our law; Jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our
highest aspiration.’
Why this fanatical hatred? We find the answer in the Qur’an, in the
Islamic doctrine of Sacred Space, and the laws of dhimmitude. The
Qur’an, believed by Muslims to be the literal word of Allah (the Arabic
word for “God”), lays the foundation for HAMAS’ visceral Jew-hatred.
Those who reject (Truth) among the People of the Book
[Christians and Jews]…will be in Hell-fire…They are the worst of
creatures. (Q 98:6)
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and kill the infidels wherever ye find them… (Q 9:5)
Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith [Islam]…(Q 5:78)
The HAMAS Covenant also includes this quote from the hadith collection of Sahih Muslim:
Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and
kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones
and trees will call: Oh, Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew
behind me, come and kill him…
Then there is the historical record, which informs us of the Islamic
institution of dhimmitude and the doctrine of Sacred Space. As the
armies of Islam overran formerly Christian and Jewish lands in the 7th century, there were too many to kill or convert; and so, beginning with the 638 CE Pact of Umar (the 2nd
Caliph), the institution of the Ahl al-Dhimma was established to
subjugate Christians and Jews to a rigid set of rules that would
relegate them to a legally enforced inferior status intended to be so
onerous as to compel them to convert to Islam.
Along with dhimmitude, the Muslim conquests developed a concept known
as “Sacred Space”. That is, the Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) must
conquer all the Dar al-Harb (House of War) because according to Islam,
the entire world belongs to Islam and must be conquered and subjugated
to it. Once conquered and/or occupied, such land is waqf, forever
endowed to Muslims by Allah. Any such waqf, if ever lost to Islam, must
be fought for by jihad until it is re-conquered.
As we look at the modern-day Jewish State of Israel, we can see that
the Jewish people not only are no longer dhimmis but have established a
powerful country in their ancestral homeland. These remarkable
accomplishments are intolerable to the forces of jihad and help to
explain why HAMAS and other Islamic terror groups like it have been so
intent upon wiping Israel from the face of the map.
Since
the terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, college campus rallies in
support of the barbaric act have erupted across the nation. Although
world focus is on Israel, this is only one part of the global plan of
Islam.
Islamic
law -- Shari’ah -- requires Jihad to be waged as "warfare against
non-Muslims” until all the world is under Islamic law. Jihadist
doctrine is advanced by both violent techniques and “civilization
jihad,” a stealth subversive effort to destroy Western civilization from
within a nation by its own hand. The pattern of Islam is to use the
courts, schools, art museums, and other major institutions including
outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Shari’ah, and
then finally take over a nation. American education is a prime target.
For
decades, billions of petro-dollars have been donated to American
universities for the purpose of altering public opinion and U.S. foreign
policies. This subversive shaping of the mindset has reached a wide
swath of American society through students studying for careers in
banking, business, law, public health, education, and urban
studies. Through university outreach, programs on the Middle East are
developed and provided to K-12 and adult education students.
Gifts
to American universities are designed also to enhance the image of the
Arab states and their rulers, effectively tamping down public criticism
of Muslim hostility to Jews as well as Christians. One of the more
recent donors and the largest investor in universities, Qatar has
an image problem as a funder and supporter of both terrorist groups
-- Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood -- and as home base to the rabidly
anti-Israel, anti-American Al Jazeera.
Former English diplomat John Kelly noted,
“They expect a return upon their donations to institutions of learning
and their subsidies to publishing houses; whether it be in the form of
subtle propaganda on behalf of Arab or Islamic causes, or the
preferential admission of their nationals, however unqualified... or the
publication of the kind of sycophantic flim-flam about themselves and
their countries which now clutters sections of the Western press and
even respectable periodical literature.”
Arab donations between 1986 and October 2022 totally nearly $11 billion with
more than 10,000 contracts and gifts spread across 273 institutions.
The total is grossly underestimated because numerous donations have gone
unreported. Beginning with Aramco’s funding in the early 1950s, donors from Arab states have
quietly made contributions to American universities, hijacking the
field of Middle East Studies with faculty, including college presidents,
who have been bought for 30 pieces of silver and are using their
positions to advance political agendas that are pro-Arab/Palestinian,
anti-Israel, and pro-radical Islam.
Though
the far Left has never had any real political power, it has controlled
the social and cultural narrative. During the summer of 2020, academics
defended looting and/or supported the destruction of the nuclear family
while Fortune 500 CEOs did nothing. The most extreme actions actually
enjoyed greater publicity.
The
brutality of Hamas in murdering babies, raping women, and taking the
elderly and disabled as hostages was cheered on by left-wing student
groups. Academics also weighed in. A Cornell University professor
speaking at a recent pro-Palestine rally called the attacks
“exhilarating.” A Stanford University instructor told her Jewish
students to stand in a corner like “Israel does to Palestinians.” Other
academics have posted their support on social media. Administrators
remained silent.
Now
it seems the radical Left has gone too far. People are standing up and
saying enough is enough. It began with Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund
billionaire who learned of an open letter signed by over 30 student
groups from Harvard -- his alma mater -- that blamed Israel instead of
Hamas for the murders. Ackman and several other CEOs contacted Harvard
to get a list of the members of each Harvard organization that issued
the letter. They are refusing to hire anyone who signed the letter.
Job offers to some graduates already have been rescinded.
Marc Rowan,
the chairman of the board of overseers at Wharton who donated $50
million to the school in 2018, called for donors to cease any further
donations until the university’s leadership changes. Vahan Gureghian, a member of the University of Pennsylvania’s board of trustees, resigned. The Huntsman family announced they have closed their checkbook on all future giving to Penn. David Magerman, who helped build the trading systems of Renaissance Technologies, said he will cease funding to Penn. The 80th richest man in the world, Israeli billionaire Idan Ofer and his wife Batia, resigned from the executive board of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.
Others followed. Playboycut ties with the porn star Mia Khalifa for cheerleading the massacres in Israel.
Meanwhile,
all those rabid Harvard activists who gleefully signed a pro-murder
statement were in a blind panic and tried to explain away their
participation, saying they did not read the letter. Sure. Are we to
believe that very smart Harvard students do not read before they sign?
The public should beware of Harvard-educated lawyers. At the end, all
students removed their names. They are learning that actions do have
consequences.
First
there was Bud Light and then Target, followed by the snowballing
scandal surrounding Ibram Kendi’s antiracism center at Boston
University. With the loss of donors, university administrations
suddenly see the virtue in institutional neutrality. Harvard,
Northwestern, and Stanford’s presidents have issued statements that they
will cease responding to political, geopolitical, or social issues that
do not directly impact the core mission of their universities. They
should have adopted this policy long ago. These cocky academics seem to
care little that the public has lost confidence in higher education and,
more especially, in elite universities.
As
Ackman pointed out, “None of these institutions are solvent without the
support of their alumni. Perhaps this is the beginning of a catalyst
for change.” The question is whether it is too late for these arrogant
institutions to regain their reputations.
Most
important is that no foreign money be allowed to flow into our
educational institutions to shape the mindset of students and influence
American policy to support a radical ideology. Since its birth in 1987,
Hamas has declared its aim is to destroy Israel. The fact is this
Islamic terrorist group intends to annihilate not just Jews but anyone
who is not a Muslim.
The
pro-Hamas rallies where students celebrated the mass murders and
beheadings show just how successful the indoctrination has been. Since
the United States shares with Israel the greatest number of the world's
Jewish population, allowing radical Islamic indoctrination of students
creates an enemy within and poses a dire threat to our national
security.
No comments:
Post a Comment